I think there are alot better representives for women out there than Senator Clinton. Married to a lier and a cheat and accepts it is not a positive role model for the country. Tell me what you think.
2007-01-26 14:29:42 · 14 answers · asked by bucknut58d 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Absolutely Not. Although I am not a liberal, it is not her liberalism that I primarily object to. She seems too scripted. Her public persona seems like a focus-group-approved, PR generated, opinion-poll-calculated veneer. Her Martha Stewart-esque announcement seemed so staged. I've never really heard her get into the deep, inner-workings of boring policy specifics. Instead, she sticks to safe platitudes like, "our children are our future." Even though I could not stand her husband, he demonstrated an awesome grasp of policy and legislation. She also steers pretty clear of making unambiguous statements about her core ideology. In her own words, what makes her tick except for the cult of personality that surrounds her? We don't know.
Furthermore, she has many, many unanswered questions from her past. How does she feel about the contracts she penned for Whitewater? How does she feel about her self-enrichment based on these contracts which dispossessed Whitewater residents without the rights of standard foreclosure law? What is her explanation for ordering Vince Foster's office to be cleaned-out before the D.C. police arrived? Why did she fire non-political civil servants in the White House Travel Office to give the contracts to her husband's political donors? Did she perjur herself swearing that she never saw Whitewater documents which later appeared and had her fingerprints all over them. How was she able to defy laws of economics and SEC rules with her miraculous profit in cattle futures? Why did she deny public access to her "Hillary-Care" fiasco?
She has many more question marks from her past which need to be answered before we can trust her with running the executive functions of the country.
2007-01-26 18:15:36 · answer #1 · answered by Jesus Jones 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"give her a chance" is like saying if she effs this up that "We The People" could do anything to change the situation. 4 years is a long time to try and experiment Look 2 points need to be considered, and these are well know facts. One is that if you look at her track record she is ruthless and cutthroat and dishonest. The second aspect is that shes a socialist. Remember this is the USA and our country is capitalist, not socialist.
So, if you want a President that has the same agenda as Lenin and is a sociopath like Hitler then "give her a chance" and mark my words, if you think Bush was bad as a Democrat in Republican clothing see what happens when you get a Marxist in Democrat clothing.
2007-01-26 14:48:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary "Lighten Rod" Clinton has been described by the three closest people to her, Dee Dee Myers, George Stephenopolis
and Dick Morris as a, "vengeful", "hot tempered", "cold, calculating" "vicious", "power hungry", "polarizing" and dishonest manipulating female, capable of going to any lengths to achieve her ends of power acquisition for power's sake alone.
She is contrived and pretentious and most people can see right through her contrived facade to the Far Left Hyper ACLU Liberal she truly is! Most do not know she was the Defense Attorney for
the Black Panther Party in the late 60's for their murder of a Sate Trooper...quite a Resume!
She is dangerous and a formidable foe whose philandering husband's sexcapades never stirred her to the most minimal outrage as a normal wife, since their "marriage" is more of a mutual power-pact than a matrimony in the traditional sense.
She is being pressured to "Come-out" and declare her Lesbianism but will not do that at this stage until after she's elected to the highest office of the land...which will never happen.
2007-01-26 14:50:57 · answer #3 · answered by baltic072 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, Hillary Clinton is not the right woman for the job. She is a communist; a capitalist hater. Instead of benefiting the American public, she's too busy destroying health care, and keeping a watchful eye on Mr. Clinton so he doesn't sleep with another Monica or Paula. She wouldn't want that!
2007-01-26 14:37:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, she is as much a lair as Bill. Lets remember Travelgate and how did the Rose Papers show up on a table, in the White House, but she doesn't know how they got there. Or how about breaking the Brown Laws, open meeting. The only reason she stayed with Bill, is because she didn't want to give up all the perks of being in the White House. She's white trailer trash and even the State of Arkansas wants nothing to do with her.
2007-01-26 14:46:50 · answer #5 · answered by Taxpayer 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have nothing to be jealous of Hillary for. I have a wonderful job,husband and family. I don't like her politics,plain and simple. And I'm from NY.
2016-05-24 04:01:03 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No . Her record speaks for itself . She's an opportunist who will do anything ; say anything ; be anything for power . Her own . She is the first First Lady in the U.S. to be indicted . She has walked scot free in countless cases where her partners went to prison .One shady deal after another . Illegal campaigning -you name it .But she gets a free pass from the liberal media . WHY?
2007-01-26 14:53:27 · answer #7 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary ran this country for eight years ....What are you thinking... She will be the first women president and will do a good job. I hope she treats the secret service ok. this time around...........
2007-01-26 14:44:34 · answer #8 · answered by tobybunch2005 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no. I think that faced with the current alternatives, she may be a lesser evil, though.
2007-01-26 14:34:27 · answer #9 · answered by borracho111 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
hell no...... she Is a comunist like everyone said.. you know she first voted to send more troops to iraq and now that bush did so she is now against it.... she is a fing hippacrit.
2007-01-26 15:01:11 · answer #10 · answered by dynamite_cluster 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋