a) walk right into a restaraunt and be seated immediately. someone takes your order right away and you get your food in a few minutes. little or no service. waiter isnt gonna be nice to you and tell him/her what his/her name is and ask how you are. you pay in the front at the cash register. approx time in restaraunt: 30 min
or
b) wait a long time to be seated. wait a long time for the person to give you the menu. wait a long time for a different person to come and take your order. wait a long time for your food. after you finish eating wait a long time for the waiter to give you your bill. then wait a long time for your waiter to come and take the bill. the service is excelllent. approx time in restaraunt: 1:00 hr to 1:30 hr
both restaraunts have the same food in taste and quality and they both have the same price. which would you rather eat at.
personally i choose a because i hate waiting to eat and to pay.
2007-01-07 19:41:24 · 16 answers · asked by wtfitsnguyen 2 in Dining Out ➔ Other - Dining Out
im sure most of you will answer A. this is my problem with some restaurants. they are trying too hard to be nice to you and it is so fake sometimes. they also take forever. i hate waiting forever at cheesecake factory to get my bill. i mean cmon....waiting to pay?!?!?!
2007-01-07 19:45:42 · update #1
It totally depends on the circumstance. If I'm just hungry, or have somewhere to be, then A. But if I'm on a date with my wife, or just having diner with some friends, then I would rather have the time, and a nice waiter/waitress to help keep the evening pleasant.
2007-01-07 19:51:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say both actually. Now a days Id pick A but here is the thing. If youre on a date and you want to spend some time with them then B would be a good way to go. You could sit there and talk over the waiting time and get to know each other better. However, if youre with a bf/husband what not that you see all the time then pick A. Can in and get your food so we can go home. Most of the time I go to a restuarant Im starving and I can just take out of the tip for their rude behavior.
2007-01-08 05:11:50 · answer #2 · answered by Jamie G 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ok this depends on your culture or family style. I would take choice B. That is if with family and friends because eating out is a social event that shouldn't be over right away. The long waits give time to chat and spend time together. And you would order an appetizer so your not starving the entire time.
I'm about to move to Italy where dinner usually takes a few hours from what I'm told because it's all about socialization. Don't go there if you don't like the wait.
2007-01-09 07:15:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would choose A because i hate waiting to eat and pay too. I would also hate the fact that i came in their and spent my money only to receive attitude from the waiter. If it wasn't for my money he/she wouldn't be getting a check so id id like to be treated nicely especially if the restaurant is expensive. Im hoping too that my getting my food without that long of a wait doesnt mean my food is coming out cold because it was already cooked, sitting their awhile, and served to me. You feel me?
2007-01-08 03:49:12 · answer #4 · answered by meka g 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If i was by myself for a bite then A and if I was with friends or on a date I would pick B. I don't care how long things take if I am enjoying my company. This is why so many older married couples are always in a rush. They have nothing to talk about anymore. It's sad but annoying if you are the waiter.
2007-01-08 03:44:53 · answer #5 · answered by nvr10pts 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A, certainly. I don't give a crap about the waiter's name, or how his mother is doing, and I don't have any particular interest in sharing my life story with him/her. I *don't* expect to be chased out of a place in 30 minutes though, especially if it's pricey; a waiter who tries that will lose his tip in a big hurry.
2007-01-08 03:50:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
C: wait a short time and have good service. Why should I have to choose?
To me, to have to wait a long time is not good service.
2007-01-08 03:55:12 · answer #7 · answered by Gee Wye 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
B) When my husband and I actually do get the opportunity to dine out, we like the time it takes to be served. We talk about a lot things, catching up on what we have missed out on lately because of work and always in the company of our children. "B" gives us a chance to unwind and be together.
2007-01-08 03:46:25 · answer #8 · answered by †♥mslamom♥† 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
B. I hate rude people. I have no problem waiting for fantastic service.
2007-01-08 03:49:32 · answer #9 · answered by playdoh1986 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
TO HAVE GOOD SERVICE DOESNOT MEAN YOU HAVE TO WAIT A LONG TIME TO GET SERVED OR SPEND HOURS IN A RESTRAUNT. I PERSONALLY PREFER PROMT SERVICE THAT GETS ME OUT IN ABOUT 45 MINUTES
\
2007-01-08 04:11:53 · answer #10 · answered by Rosiland C 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋