2006-12-31 20:30:10 · 16 answers · asked by Adnan Q 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Probably not...at least, his people was his problem, now, is US's problem...
2006-12-31 20:32:59 · answer #1 · answered by Mimi 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
the international is a worse place considering the fact that Saddam Hussein's passing besides the undeniable fact that this has no longer something to do with him. there's a persuasive argument that asserts Iraq is worse off with out him on the instant on many counts, considering the fact that there are various factions combating one yet another. And a starting to be dying toll from random bombs. one might desire to assert that the international is extra helpful off with out him, yet I if it is the case why are we tolerating activities in Zimbabwe or Darfur whose all and sundry is suffering extra suitable difficulty than any Iraqi under Saddam.
2016-11-25 19:47:08 · answer #2 · answered by rolland 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course not its the same thing whether hes dead or alive there will always be an evil lik they say"GOOD AND EVIL THERE's NEVER ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER"
now u tell me will the world live longer?not to forget that there is george bush! thats lik another saddam hussein!
the innocent women, children and men are dieng in iraq while the rest of the world is busy with their luxury life ppl need to wake up in this fake dream that they r living!!
the world will never be a safe place anymore!
2006-12-31 20:53:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
too many things are wrong with the world..maybe for some people it is a little better..he wasnt doing much good in my opinion..but with religion and politics dominating the world and people disagreeing with each other constantly..it's gonna take a long time before it gets better.
2006-12-31 20:32:33 · answer #4 · answered by Sma 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if the world but the people in Iraq sure are, even though I did not feel to good when I heard he was hung. I don't wish death on anyone but I do know that there is consequences to bad actions and that was his consequence he asked for it.
2006-12-31 20:33:36 · answer #5 · answered by calimexgirl!! 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The world will go on as it has for many years; hate and anger and desire will run rampant and no one will even attempt to take control of themselves. His death will make no difference. It is just a sad thing that he must die to serve humanity.
2006-12-31 20:32:59 · answer #6 · answered by Elerth Morrow ™ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dude is the world better with televised assasination/execution the talk of it glorifies death as war does also we need to wake up and be as mature as we really are by we I mean the earth...
2006-12-31 20:33:13 · answer #7 · answered by Primus Amare 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's a trick question. Yes, but the world is still a screwed up place...
2006-12-31 20:32:46 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's better without him free, but once he was captured it doesn't make a difference if he is dead or not.
2006-12-31 20:32:23 · answer #9 · answered by John 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, but he had to be held accountable for his crimes and justice had to be seen to be done by those who suffered so dreadfully under his cruel regime.
2006-12-31 20:47:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's like asking if the world was better after Hitler was gone. Uh, yeah.
2006-12-31 20:32:07 · answer #11 · answered by Eileen 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋