2006-12-28 13:07:44 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Although President Bush was not involved with the trial, he was responsible for the dictators downfall and ultimately his demise.
2006-12-28 13:17:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Did capturing Saddam in 2003 mean that Bush did something right, then?
2006-12-28 21:21:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO
It only means that Saddam will not testify before Congress.
Go big Red Go
2006-12-28 22:12:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, baby.
EDIT: If people in the US could understand the psychological war we are in, this execution is a US victory. Let's stop beating on each other, and CLAIM IT!
2006-12-28 21:11:59 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
bush wasn't actually involved in the trial... Saddam may have gotten off if he was involved...hahaha...
so... I don't really see it that way... the new Iraqi government gets the credit in my mind...
2006-12-28 21:14:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes.
2006-12-28 21:19:33 · answer #6 · answered by marijuwannahman 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes. But he did do something wrong. Protecting people like you.
2006-12-28 21:13:51 · answer #7 · answered by Gods Girl...check my new profile 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I am still wondering where Osama bin Laden is...
2006-12-28 21:14:11 · answer #8 · answered by BellyRubz 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no .. it means we've come a long way backward ... its medieval imo .. saddam has killed his thousands and bush his hundreds of thousands ..
2006-12-28 21:10:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
MEET THE NEW BOSS, SAME AS THE OLD BOSS
2006-12-28 21:10:17 · answer #10 · answered by Nick F 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋