English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He lied to parliament about the WMDs, so what else would he lie about?

2006-12-16 04:49:35 · 21 answers · asked by mesun1408 6 in Politics & Government Government

http://tinyurl.com/y9l8ef

2006-12-16 04:57:18 · update #1

21 answers

No way. I am from the UK

2006-12-16 04:51:25 · answer #1 · answered by Halucinagenic 2 · 2 2

After reading some of these answers, I have com to one conclusion. you Tony Blair and Geo. Bush bashers are a
group of rubber lips that put no real tought to what you are
saying, you say things that you truly don't know anything about
You say WWDs was a lie because you heard some other party say it which was said to make their party look good.
This all gives the enemy a real god message don't you agree.

2006-12-16 08:57:03 · answer #2 · answered by Auburn 5 · 1 1

Tony Blair should lead the troops out on their daily patrols instead of going round the world "sorting" out peoples problems.

2006-12-16 16:48:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

This is a loaded, biased question that is based on several presumptions:

1. That Tony Blair is a liar.
2. That the WMDs did not exist. (See: Nizar Nayuf and George Sada.)
3. That a soldier would be going to war "for" Tony Blair and not for a larger cause.

Try rephrasing the question in a non-rhetorical, objective manner, and I might be interested.

Do a little analytical reading, people, before giving me the thumbs down. I am not really a Bush fan, have been disappointed by him -- but neither am I a fan of questions that demand the answerer to go along with a whole set of built-in opinions and presumptions before even attempting to formulate a response.

And do you even know who George Sada and Nizar Nayuf are, or you just lazily hitting the thumbs down button on me because, well, Bush and Blair are EVIL and my answer at least superficially appears to support Blair, so therefore it must be invalid? Do some research before going along with the sheep.

2006-12-16 05:01:43 · answer #4 · answered by CO_Hiker 3 · 1 6

Everything, He is a politician and we elected him to lie for us. Unfortunately service personnel have no choice about what they do. Politicians have a choice. Toe the party line or we take the key to your executive toilet off you. So they send people like us in, to die in a pointless war. Didn't notice Blair in the front lines! did you?. Was there for the photo shoot afterwards tho.

2006-12-16 08:40:47 · answer #5 · answered by naplusultra 4 · 0 1

try not 2 concentrate on the war alone, he's not called B'LIAR 4 nothing, he lies all the time!
how many migrants we won't b getting from Romanian & Bulgaria in January.
or Turkey, when they finally join the EU next year.
pay back/reward 4 allowing Aircraft/munitions etc etc, 2 stop over, pending the invasion and the Iraq war.

and how he hasn't really sold the NHS out 2 the US.
c link below.

2006-12-16 04:57:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

the soldier fights for queen and country, the queen lives in fear of
the gov, who tell her what she can and cant say, she knows britain has been betrayed, she knows blair is a traitor, the fear strategy against the queen comes from the press and politicians, ability to brainwash the public into turninmg against the queen. the country itself is living with fear and anxiety, no monarchy will be allowed in the "united states of europe" it will have a corrupt president.the queen as with the british people need to be rescued from traitors, as soon as the troops realise this the sooner they can stop the rot and set britain free from traitors. the troops are fighting for blair. the queen is a prisoner of war in her own land like the rest of us.

2006-12-16 19:38:38 · answer #7 · answered by trucker 5 · 1 2

Go to war for him, I wouldn't eve spit on him if him and his fat B*TCH wife were on fire.

The only things that piteously naive libertine and a putrid, enema-addicted leaking carbuncle on the posterior of a Beauty Queen has done for the last 10 years is lie and spin.

2006-12-17 00:01:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No I wouldn't go to war for Jellyfish (no backbone) Blair.
In war People join to fight for what they believe in. I noticed that the intake of Army recruits is down and the number of deserters have risen. He'd lie about anything to keep his cushy lifestyle.

2006-12-16 05:06:31 · answer #9 · answered by st.abbs 5 · 2 2

Don't think he ever lied about the war.
After the fall of Afghanistan and Iraq .
It was a success and the war was over.
What went wrong after that was not of their own doing.
something extra ordinary happened that got every living human kind like you and me including the man himself was all at loss and blurr on what went wrong out there in planet of apes.
Were able to trace the faults when little children expose the blunders and slip-ups with human errors was created back in the past expose with time in planet of apes.
Don't forget every living human kind is not perfect in planet of apes.
Why must he risk the lives of children out there in planet of apes?
Is it a joke for him to put human lives at risk out there?
Any sensible living human kind will not do that in planet of apes.

2006-12-16 21:03:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Tony tells a lot of Porkies... but at the end of the day ..the Iraq thing wasn't just about Tony..think about it - he is the Labour leader with all those mad CND punters .. a left wing anti war government - so someone bigger than Tony was pulling the strings..

2006-12-16 04:53:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers