I think the problem with "winning in Iraq" is that it is wrong in the first place. Just like denying a woman the ability to choose, or molesting pre-sexual human beings. It's all wrong, and it's not just liberals on either side who have a problem with it.
2006-12-06 01:49:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
2⤋
You're so full of crap! The reason why we're opposed to the war in Iraq is because it was based on a lie. And not only that, but we knew from the very beginning that it would be a disaster. And yes, most of us are for protecting a woman's right to choose, but I don't know of any liberals who support the legalization of child pornography. Perhaps you should ask fellow conservative Mark Foley if he does, though.
2006-12-06 09:50:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by tangerine 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
That's it!! I am a liberal. I am also a veteran. How dare you or any of the other neocon sheep on here accuse me of ever fighting for child pornography!! How dare you or any other mindless party line followers accuse me of not wanting my nations armed forces to be successful!! When you brainlessly generalize you assault many of those who have honorably served this nation in combat and time of need. Have you done that? The only reason I would guess not is that I cannot picture any veteran saying what you have said while realizing there are veterans and active duty service persons who believe we should not be in Iraq. With your question you judge many who have served their nation honorably. You have also judged many who gave their last full measure in that service. You owe every one of them an apology.
2006-12-06 09:53:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by toff 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Were not though where killing Innocent people... Yes i would like to see there be no terrorists but that's not going to happen and to be honest I'm pro choice and on the child pornography that's just wrong.....The thing with Iraq is your killing U.S. Soldiers and Innocent Iraqis while your trying to set up a corrupt democratic government and to be honest its not really working out for you....Kinda like Vietnam or say Korea see a pattern here because i do.....
2006-12-06 09:51:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lab Runner 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well the Republican haven't won. WE wouldn't have be in Iraq if the democrats were in charge. We would have been after BEN LADIN the person responible for 9/11.
I don't care what party you belong to childporngraphy is wrong. ARe you so desparate for people to jump over to the republican side that you are will tell start lying about childporngraphy?
2006-12-06 09:56:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by wondermom 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
What type of detergent have you be in contact with that has that thought process so "washed" that you would assume that Liberals would like to Lose the Iraqi war,however there remains the possibly that some "wars" simply cannot be won militarily,and when that fact becomes evident,it's time to move into another arena of more probable likelihood for some sort of "success"
2006-12-06 09:53:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
why don't you try having an open debate with a liberal and actually seeing where we stand as opposed to throwing false rants around in the name of propaganda.... oh wait, you'd actually have to have knowledge, wisdom and maturity to do that.. something you aren't ready for yet.
2006-12-06 09:52:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by pip 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Liberals never want to fight---they would rather talk and talk and talk until the problem fades away. They speak all these fine ideas but when do they ever actually do anything?
2006-12-06 10:05:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by golden oldy 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
This must be some of that bipartisanship the president was babbling about today.
2006-12-06 09:53:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
This does not deserve an intelligent rebuttal.
So:
I like pie.
2006-12-06 09:57:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by sparky52881 5
·
2⤊
0⤋