English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I wonder what wage ratio with Untied States would slow down immigration to Mexico. Im thinking its gotta be higher than Western Europe because of the fact states like West Virginia, and North Dakota been losing population because the wages in Major cities are higher. Twin Cities, or Washington, Baltimore make 30% to 80% more than people in outstate areas and North Dakota, West Virgnia. North Dakota is losing population for the same reason as people leave mexico because of a lack of jobs, and ecnomic growth in those areas. I figure wage gaps draws people no matter what and I think were in catch 22. Even if you deported every illegal we put the strain on the rural areas where the wages are 50% lower and the jobs are scare, so we need to figure out how to balance population inflows urban vs rural settings

2006-10-22 11:13:36 · 3 answers · asked by ram456456 5 in Politics & Government Government

3 answers

It is more complex than simply the wage ratio. You also have to figure in things like quality of life, family, friends, and many other things that are difficult to put a price tag on.

2006-10-22 11:19:55 · answer #1 · answered by Paul K 6 · 1 0

West Virginia is slowly gaining population, the wage gap in rural areas isnt as high as you think most jobs in rural areas are high paying blue collar jobs, the reason people leave rural areas is because of the lack of these jobs, and a good number of people are simply living off of welfare, and illegally gaining other social security benifits.

2006-10-22 11:25:52 · answer #2 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 0 0

extremely can't get previous the link you made between 'advertising bodies' i.e. prostitution and being barred from emotionally satisfying activities. you're honestly desirous to make this a parallel? So, on account that's a assertion with a query mark caught on the top, it does no longer warrant an answer. a minimum of you're acknolwedging that men are in cost, and that customarily they do no longer stick to a feminist schedule, and the gadgets of the state do play an all encompassing function in our socialisation. Feminist ideology isn't a hazard to 'our' own freedom it is going to and does pose a hazard to the belief of enshrining male privilege, and whichever way your political pendulum swings advocating prostitution as an magnificent occasion of unfastened economic selection and civil liberties is reprehensible! Feminisms ought to be a hazard to the prestige quo! Liberalism and feminism isn't using worldwide capitalism...by no skill has and by no skill will...and despite the fact that if it have been prostitution could by no skill be seen a actual profession selection for liberated women folk..that or domicile projects?

2016-11-24 23:09:42 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers