i'm answering questions, but i'm babbling like a bollocks, can you do any better or worse?
2006-10-13 14:26:15 · 36 answers · asked by gary s 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
... then the purple cow came across the field and smacked that basketball right into Shara and Jacob sat on the bus until he couldn't hold it in anymore but the coffee was fresh so it wasn't so bad
2006-10-13 14:34:23 · answer #1 · answered by gummybear1772 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
May be I can, but then for how long, and at what cost? Not for long if I am being totally whimsical or totally lackadaisical on other people’s behalf. I understand that when people ask questions or answer questions they feel good about being in company of wise people. They feel enjoyment in talking good sense and sharing what they know best with other people in a best possible way. There is a subtle cadence in this. But if we babble, become unreasonable or fret for too long we loose interest. And if we still plod on then there must be some very curious reason for that – the one that we needs to look into carefully.
The fact is that we cannot be even unreasonable without a reason. All that we do has reason behind it. That reason may not be in our own grasp but it is always there. May be we answer just because we seek other people’s approval of our approach. Or may be we are after points, or could be we are bored and should not be here at the first place – the reason can be numerous. We need not be one hundred percent correct while answering a question, but we need to be sure within and then the answer will come out equally sharply and beautifully.
2006-10-14 02:39:06 · answer #2 · answered by Shahid 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it's hard to say for certain but I do feel that there is a possiblity that I might, in certain circumstances and if conditions were near to normal, be able to have a try at answering some questions in what might be described by some people as being stupid or indecisive.
But I don't really know
2006-10-13 22:25:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I uh I don't think answering indecisively is the issue. I think the issue might be not answering decisively. Without any factual basis, random outbursts of semi-logical thinking can occur, followed by haphazardly formed opinions without any thought behind them. Or it might be that opinions are true but can't be backed up. Without any evidence we're like the deaf leading the blind, or is it the mute leading the deaf? Anyway, does this help?
2006-10-13 14:40:11 · answer #4 · answered by April J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
71
2006-10-13 14:34:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Am I calling a kettle black or has it always been that colour the handle is wooden but it`s brown with grooves along it the base is copper but only in my dreams what was the question?about that...Are we just a lovely bunch of people who enjoy trying to help others. Now where`s Tony`s question?
2006-10-14 00:32:06 · answer #6 · answered by edison 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that is a definite maybe, 'cos I used to be very indecisive, but now, I'm not so sure.
2006-10-13 20:53:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Banana, Squid, Ain't
2006-10-13 17:08:36 · answer #8 · answered by Marcia B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are wiffleballs for that grommet tasting. Of course wingnuts and trembling doormice revolve in the disappointng cargohold of our collective pysches.
But I digress.
Yes.
2006-10-13 14:36:57 · answer #9 · answered by mmd 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gee, I dunno, let me think about it and get back to you. Maybe, have to think about that too.
I'll make up my mind about answering when I have thought about whether I should or not. Then I'll know if I'll answer the question or think about it again. You know, it isn't easy to give an answer when you're not sure if you have the knowledge to give an answer that will satisfy the asker. At least I think that's what I think. Let me think about that. I'll get back to you on that one as well.
2006-10-13 15:49:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋