Should guns be banned from civilian use?!?

Question

Do you think that there should be a law stating that civilians should not be able to own guns?

Answer 1

No. I have already had to protect myself and my family from an intruder who wanted to rob us and molest my daughter. I shot him right in the knee cap and should have shot him in the head, I have a permit so I got a large fine but no time in jail. He tried to sue me but I won thank god..

Answer 2

The only protection that a person has is to be armed.
In the first place, it is impossible to make it stick. What is it with you people who cannot understand what "Shall not be infringed" This country was founded and has progressed in the manner it has because of the Bill of Rights which no other government on Earth has.

Your question is asinine, Stupid and totally without reason. The attempts do disarm the American people have been going now for over 60 years, and it is all Propaganda, Most of the Media tries to sell the Idea that Guns cause crime. Well let me tell you; If Guns cause crime, then pencils cause errors in writing.

The Constitution spells it out: The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

What is it about that simple phrase that you do not understand.
Your type is a danger to every free citizen in this country. There: You asked the question, now you live with the Answer.

I just read that post about bears in Urban Areas. Urban Areas would be safer with bears roaming the streets than they are with the 30,000 gang members in Los Angeles county alone. He obviouslly gets his opinions from a box of Crackerjack)

Answer 3

Not only no, but hell no, I have had guns since I was 9 years old, I am 60 now and have never causes harm to another human, and besides if the military and the police are the only one with guns the country will be in big trouble. BTW, I am a democrat for all you repukes out there.

Answer 4

He would have a no longer common time making gun possession unlawful yet he would desire to outlaw proprietor deliver of specific varieties of weapons , in basic terms like Clinton did and make the requirement so intense that it might make it very almost imposable purchase one , now what He would do approximately those already in American domicile i've got not a clue . As one Poster suggested it might reason a rebellion the like have not been considered because of the fact the american Revolution .

Answer 5

first of all, it would go against the bill of rights... plus guns don't kill people, people kill people... also if someone snuck into your home, who's a lot stronger then you; what would you do, try to hit him with a bat, we need guns as protection... people who use guns for the wrong reasons, will find some thing else to use, which means people who use guns against those "bad" people would have to find something else to use also= less effective....also if the gov. tried to take away the right to bar arms, think of all the bad stuff that will happen as a result= who knows, war, just chaos.... So NO

Answer 6

I do not think the guns are the problem. First, guns do not kill people, people kill people. Eliminating guns from civillian use will not reduce crime.

Secondly, if civilian ownership of firearms is made illegal, then only law-biding citizens will give up their firearms. Thus still leaving weapons in the hands of people who would use them for crime.

Gun control is not the answer. Education is.

Answer 7

No. Even though I don't own a gun or want one I think it is your right to bear arms it's in the constitution. Many believe flag burning should be banned but is not. Even though thats an expression not a spoken word.

Answer 8

No I am a hardcore Liberal and I could care less if people have guns. In fact I think with Bush and Co. in office we should all have guns to protect us from new terrorist that he created. Hell I don`t care if people want to fire off some ordnance which takes two people to use as long as they are trained and safe approved spot.

Answer 9

People who abuse guns usually have obtained them illegally anyhow so gun laws are useless. The laws have not done much to limit misuse of weapons but have kept law abiding citizens from protecting themselves because of lack of willpower to go through all the paperwork.

Answer 10

You have got to be a liberal. Liberals don't understand that criminals and terrorists will always have guns.They do not care about laws. Making guns against the law will only disarm law abiding citizens that need protection against he criminals and terrorists.

Answer 11

Unfortunately, some dumb-as$ back in the day decided that everybody had a right to have a gun to protect themselves from...I don't know, bears. Obviously, there are no bears in urban areas anymore so it's just an outdated law. And no, I don't think guns should be banned from civilian use, but I think it should be banned from citizen's use. There's a difference.