Last I heard the language of the how-to documents was Chinese not English, mate.
"Republicans love to blame others..."
And you are what, the pot calling the kettle black? It's very becoming, quite attractive.
"..yet the majority of Republican leaders..." wot? there's your double-standard mate... priceless, yes?
You seem hostile...bwwaahahaha
Best wishes,
pup
2006-10-10 16:34:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by . 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Republicans are still going to try to blame the Clinton administration, because he allowed N. Korea to build nuclear reactors. Those reactors were supposed to be for peaceful, power generating purposes. Now, Bush has had 6 years to stop N. Korea from building a nuke. N. Korea was very open about their intention to build a nuke, yet Bush did nothing about it. How this could possibly blamed on Clinton and his Administration, I don't know. As far as the gay bashing goes, that is the typical double standard that most politicians practice. It's all right for them to do it, but shame on anyone else for doing it.
2006-10-11 00:25:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by jack jr 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Once again a liberal has tried to twist the facts. It was the Clinton pampering of the radical N Korean regime that permitted this mess. Naturally the Liberal Left is hiding behind their fantasies again and trying to blame the republicans. The way liberals tear down the US and preach submission is enabling the terrorist and radicals to continue their actions. If the liberals showed some balls and let the enemy know they will fight and now withdraw and submit the world would be better. How can you compare republicans being gay when the dummycrats have such great records on tolerating and rewarding immoral conduct. Like Barney Franks's being a leading figure in the dummycratic party and the Kennedy family has kept drunks in office for 40 years.
2006-10-10 23:33:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by old codger 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
It's real easy for you to blame Republicans for the world being a mess. As I recall we have had both Dem & Rep as presidents over the years. The only thing I can see out of all of it is. Our News services (CNN NBC ABC etc.) are the United States worst enemies. When was the last time you have seen or heard of somebody in public office doing anything Good! It makes me sick to hear these poeple talk about arab & asian countries when most of them have never lived in one only visit when the news dictates they need to be there. Of course they only see what these gov'ts will allow them to see. You want to see how the rest of the world really is. Go there & live for 3 - 5 years. Then come home & tell me how bad it is here in the good old USA. President Bill Clinton did a lot of spinning the news. I was working overseas in an Arab country when Pres Bill pulled his little stunt with Monica. YOU cannot even imagine the kind of ridicule other americans and myself took over that. Keep in mind what every president does while he is in office does not really effect the country until he has been out of office for 4 - 8 years. We as voters may not like what our gov't does all the time, but I will definitely support them no matter what party they represent. I have never voted straight Dem or Rep. I always take into consideration who is the best man for the job. WE THE POEPLE owe it ourselves to elect the best man for the job. Regardless of race, color or creed.
When a nuke lands in your backyard from one of these countries that don't play well with others. I want you to say that we did the right thing by leaving them alone & letting them develop nukes. While you are rotting away from radiation poisoning.
As for gay marriage rights a poll that I saw on it showed 85% of all americans are against it. If you were actually in public office & up for re-election would you commit political suicide by publicly speaking out at this time saying you are all for it? Not if you want to keep your job. Gay rights definely would not get you re-elected, but taking a stand on world issues might. You can call it double standard if you want. You may not like the republicans, but what have the democrats done for us lately? Other than blame the republicans for everything that is wrong in the world. Last time I looked congress is ran by democrats & republicans. As a voter I would say they are both to blame.
2006-10-11 00:18:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by oilfieldinsultant 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Following the DPRK's spring 1994 unloading of fuel from its five-megawatt nuclear reactor and the resultant US push for UN sanctions, former President Carter's visit to Pyongyang in June 1994 helped to defuse tensions and resulted in renewed South-North talks. A third round of talks between the US and the DPRK opened in Geneva on July 8, 1994. However, the sudden death of North Korean leader Kim Il Sung on July 8, 1994 halted plans for a first ever South-North presidential summit and led to another period of inter-Korean animosity. The talks were recessed upon news of the death of North Korean President Kim Il Sung, then resumed in August. These talks concluded with the Agreed Framework.
Under the framework agreement, the North would freeze and eventually dismantle its existing suspect nuclear program, including the 50 MW and 200 MW graphite-moderated reactors under construction, as well as its existing 5 MW reactor and nuclear fuel reprocessing facility. In return, Pyongyang would be provided with alternative energy, initially in the form of heavy oil, and eventually two proliferation-resistant light water reactors (LWR). The two 1,000 MW light-water nuclear reactors would be safer and would produce much less plutonium, in order to help boost the supply of electricity in the North, which is now in a critical shortage. The agreement also included gradual improvement of relations between the US and the DPRK, and committed North Korea to engage in South-North dialogue.
Read the whole story at:
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/dprk/nuke/...
2006-10-10 23:30:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush warned us about N Korea..
"America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
Oops! He was talking about Iraq! Iraq had no nuclear program. What an idiot Bush is! Oh well, getting nuked will be quick and painless.
2006-10-10 23:32:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Phil S 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yep!
They snoozed while the twin towers were attacked and they'll snooze while we get attacked by North Korea.
Then, if bush is still in office, we'll probably invade and occupy Venezuela because Bush will convince the weak minded republicans that the North Korean Terrorists have fled to Venezuela.
The first thing he'll order is the securing of their oil fields.
2006-10-10 23:39:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Why would we possibly blame Bill Clinton for the nuclear device. Is it just because he and Albright gave them nuclear reactors. That is such a stretch. Not as big a stretch as you managing to weave something about sexual orientation into a nuclear weapons question.
Thank you for not being a Republican.
2006-10-10 23:31:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
yes, they are salivating at the opportunity to start another war. Perhaps in the process destroying our country. Who knows they might even start the draft to fight their little imperialist adventure. I know I'll feel better when the democrats take back congress.
2006-10-11 19:48:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jim 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
hey, Clinton and Jimmy Carter started this mess! read current history before the libs rewrite it?
2006-10-10 23:35:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋