2006-09-17 17:30:29 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Definition: If they were traitors in Bush's miniscule mind.
2006-09-17 17:49:37 · update #1
DoucheRider - Another snappy comeback.
2006-09-17 18:29:39 · update #2
VegetableAmericanski - I've never been shot, but I am hung.
2006-09-17 18:31:47 · update #3
battle-ax - I'm not sure you'd want that job - you have to blow Hayden.
2006-09-17 18:35:08 · update #4
define liberal traitor
EDIT:
OK ...Then put me up on the 10 most wanted
2006-09-17 17:41:40 · answer #1 · answered by dstr 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure if Bush could get away with anything like he wants, he would torture and murder anyone who disagreed with him.
Liberals are the heart of America so Liberals would probably torture Bush for being a traitor of our American values.
2006-09-18 00:44:21 · answer #2 · answered by p2prox 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
They wouldn't even have to be traitors or even terrorists, simply suspects. In reality, no matter what anyone tells you, many of the torture-ees were simply accused suspects and nothing more. With some of them we gained no more valid information than we would torturing helpless butterflies. Some of them had no information to provide, so they made some up in order to have the torture stop. Do you honestly believe your citizenship would make a difference? Does it seem to be respected so far?
Your one-word answer: SURE!
2006-09-18 00:54:52 · answer #3 · answered by Candidus 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Sure he would, why do you think he's slowly removing the Constitution? Rewriting the laws of the Geneva convention?Illegally wiretapping? Maybe, if we give the current administration (including Bush) enough rope, they'll all hang themselves.
What they are currently doing, scares me terribly. Because, some country will say enough is too much already, and they'll wipe us off this earth. Maybe Russia, or China, or any of the other countries that hate us.
2006-09-18 02:24:16 · answer #4 · answered by Schona 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Liberals aren't traitors, it's the conserves who are dividing
this country.
But, to stay true to your question, I'd have to say he tortures
me every time I have to fill up the gas tank and I'm not a traitor, just a liberal.
You may have just given him his next idea. Help!
What's Deuce Rider doing hanging out with the libs?
A closet lib?
2006-09-18 01:59:06 · answer #5 · answered by Calee 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
Anyone declared an enemy of the people will be seized, and tortured, their lands and properties will be forfeit, and they will be forced to implicate others, so that this traitorous enemy of the people and all like them can be eliminated.
Oh wait, that was the mandate of the Spanish Inquisition, I misread heretic for traitor...sorry.
2006-09-18 00:50:57 · answer #6 · answered by Hatir Ba Loon 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
LMFAO, I am sure they will be next. I don't agree with torture to any human being or animal for that matter and if they will torture one it is only a matter of time before they use the law to justify torturing Americans or English or Democrats lol. Are you sure Leann isn't Ann Coulter??
2006-09-18 01:05:59 · answer #7 · answered by kymanosteel 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Bush is a torturer. He has spit in the face of America's humanity.
I don't doubt that the US has used torture in the past. They undoubtedly have. The difference is declaring it necessary because, well gosh darn it, we get some good information out of 'em! That's good enough for Bush!
Nobody has disputed the fact that torture works. They dispute the humanity of it.
2006-09-18 00:57:42 · answer #8 · answered by Paladin 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Oh Come On Now. You Liberals are really getting carried away with your self importance!
What would Bush have to gain by torture. Some lousy jokes!
You question tops them all, for stupidity that is!
I can't take anymore Bush bashing, that is. I quit for the night!
2006-09-18 01:06:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Many bloodthirsty conservatives would like to torture most anyone who disagrees with them even in the slightest.
2006-09-18 00:43:19 · answer #10 · answered by brian2412 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Why?
What possible new information could he hope to obtain that the liberals haven't already spewed out due to their contempt for him?
It wouldn't take torture anyway, just a far left reporter with a pad and pencil.
2006-09-18 00:55:03 · answer #11 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋