2006-09-17 12:25:24 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The President has told you why we are in Iraq a hundred times and it has very little to do with WMD (which they eventually found).
It is to keep the terrorists fighting over there so they don't come HERE.
It is also a place that harbored many people who wanted to blow us up.
Liberals just do not GET IT and I feel bad for you!
2006-09-17 12:31:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 4⤋
It's obvious that you can't prove the war was based solely on lies or any of your other ignorant assertions.
2006-09-17 19:49:37 · answer #2 · answered by MorgantonNC 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If human civilization is going to survive, the population will have to become organized to support different values than those that the conservatives, neocons and George W. Bush have fed the nation for a long time now...
No more Reaganology.
we should reject it and seek the answers from talking to our neghbors and realizing that hot air from conservatives is why these people have died in Iraq. To add insult to injury Bush won't even go to thier funerals or acknowledge them with any respect.
I am sick of them and we need to vote them out in every election we can for many years until better people run the country. Then we shouldn't even stop at that.... All Power to the People.
2006-09-17 19:44:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
We are not based at Iraq, based on lies. We are at Iraq to accomplish Americas goal, I have a question for you??? Why do you ignore Clinton's comments? Why do you ignore the comments by liberal senators?, little spineless piss weeds, who changed their story when they thought they might lose a few votes?
Bill Clinton himself declared Saddam Hussein a threat.
Now, liberals wash their hands in a desperate attempt to get votes. You really are pathetic.
2006-09-17 19:41:38 · answer #4 · answered by zzz 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
That George Bush's brother Marvin sat on the board of the Kuwaiti-owned company which provided electronic security to the World Trade Centre, Dulles Airport and United Airlines means nothing more than you must admit those Bush boys have done alright for themselves.
That George Bush found success as a businessman only after the investment of Osama’s brother Salem and reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mahfouz is just one of those things - one of those crazy things.
That Osama bin Laden is known to have been an asset of US foreign policy in no way implies he still is.
That al Qaeda was active in the Balkan conflict, fighting on the same side as the US as recently as 1999, while the US protected its cells, is merely one of history's little aberrations.
The claims of Michael Springman, State Department veteran of the Jeddah visa bureau, that the CIA ran the office and issued visas to al Qaeda members so they could receive training in the United States, sound like the sour grapes of someone who was fired for making such wild accusations.
That one of George Bush's first acts as President, in January 2001, was to end the two-year deployment of attack submarines which were positioned within striking distance of al Qaeda's Afghanistan camps, even as the group's guilt for the Cole bombing was established, proves that a transition from one administration to the next is never an easy task.
That so many influential figures in and close to the Bush White House had expressed, just a year before the attacks, the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" before their militarist ambitions could be fulfilled, demonstrates nothing more than the accidental virtue of being in the right place at the right time.
2006-09-17 19:29:23 · answer #5 · answered by dstr 6 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Stuff your face with gummy bears while dictators gas 10's of thousands of their own people, attack their neighbors and give safe harbor to Islamic fascist maggots that beat their women and whose greatest perceived accomplishment is to have sex with72 virgins....A dandy award for blowing up school children wouldn't you say? Note: Eat your gummy bears in Iran or Somalia....ooops, sorry, you might have to get off your comfortable couch!
2006-09-17 21:19:10 · answer #6 · answered by mitchskram 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
To those of you who believe that we were not lied to. I suggest a reading of the report done by the 9/11 commission. Before you start handing out partisan judgment on them, remember they were selected by the REPUBLICAN senate. It was also co-chaired one republican one democrat. You will find countless instances of lies and deceit in black and white, written by reps and demos. In fact the Idiot in Cheif recently admitted that Saddam had no ties to Al-Qaeda, and he had no WMDs. Here's a fact that is rarely looked at: Saddam is reported to have killed and tortured about 30,000 Iraqis. Since we have taken over Iraq there have been over 100,000 civilians killed. Is Iraq better off? I don't think so.
2006-09-17 19:39:53 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Since right now, and you can start by proving we are at war anywhere, based on lies.
2006-09-17 19:26:58 · answer #8 · answered by oklatom 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Get a grip - you're doing the drama-queen number and, although it's done by a few hundred people on this "forum", it does get really tiring.
If I could make a suggestion: make a contribution - factual information that may not be well-known, a thoughful response to something that's important to you and includes a genuine question, etc. Just a suggestion - that's all.
2006-09-17 19:32:37 · answer #9 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Seein we have killed Al Queda leaders there, guess it wasnt a lie that Al Queda was in Iraq too
2006-09-17 19:37:07 · answer #10 · answered by itsallover 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋