Gore threw out the military votes, because the aircraft carrier they served on had a post office that didnt stamp the date on the outgoing mail. If I were a liberal, I wouldnt want the military voting either, just more votes for the other guy.
They could be like JFK in 60' and have whole cemeteries vote Democrat.
2006-09-15 16:52:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
The democrats were attempting for decades to push by authorities mandated wellbeing insurance. They knew the yankee human beings have consistently rejected it and they actually knew that this three hundred and sixty 5 days develop into no diverse thinking the adament rejection on the city hall conferences and the massive protests. this is the biggest reason the Tea party grew so instantly yet they took this chance employing their huge majority to push it by. the yankee human beings are not likely to provide the Democrats yet another substitute to manage for a lengthy time period. That being stated, it looks the Democrats have created such an monetary mess on the very roots of our monetary gadget that there can be an entire cave in of our overseas money. The party in skill on the time severe monetary topics floor consistently looks to get the blame. those who do not pay interest to what is going on oftentimes do not study what fairly led to such complications. Globalization has each and every thing to do with it. i imagine the Democrats knew they could lose their majority yet I doubt they did so deliberately. i'm older and function considered this style of difficulty before (under no circumstances this undesirable) yet no count number what the Republicans do, the yankee persons are going to be suffering some severe misery before it really is all straightened out and we are again on an organization footing economically. Globally our difficulty is that our high quality of existence is deliberately being decreased to spread the wealth to adverse countries. international commerce might want to be a great deal simplified if in basic terms one overseas money existed. even as the U. S. dollar is not the reserve international overseas money our dollar will cave in and there'll be a unmarried overseas money. Our personal elected officials have some distance a lot less effect on what occurs in our personal u . s . a .. both activities firmly position self belief in international commerce and are prepared to bypass to any lengths to extend our international markets. regrettably, that looks to consistently be unfavourable to our destiny till the U. S. monetary gadget hits bottom for further or less seventy 5% of voters and we'd want to be compelled to initiate over at a low salary to be aggressive. If our technologies develop into saved secret we'd want to have possible with new innovation yet our authorities would not even take care of that.
2016-11-27 01:39:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by eskdale 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not likely, the Reps did a bang up job last time. Hopefully they haven't fixed the voting machines through all the connected companies in their web.
Perhaps we won't get to vote anyway, Bush has all the paper work to postpone the election because of war. and as he said a week ago, this fight of good versus evil may go on for decades, but we will prevail! In the event that there is a protest , he's got the right to proclaim martial law and incarcerate any or all.
Halliburton got the contract last year to build Civilian Detention Camps.
So, keep playing with your funny little pictures, they become you.
2006-09-15 16:59:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Will the Supreme Court again stop election officials from counting the ballots?
2006-09-15 17:05:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Both parties will do any damn thing they can to get and retain power. Hell of a shame, but integrity seems to have no place in politics. The people who'd make the best leaders have absolutely NO chance of getting elected...
2006-09-15 16:56:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No date tonight Mr. Howard?
Can't imagune that with your winning personality!
Oh yeah you asked a question, I think it would be ill advised for the Dems to have any votes thrown out.
2006-09-15 17:12:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bad M 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oh! A wise guy eh? nyuck nyuck nyuk
2006-09-15 16:52:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kelly T 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is a strictly Republican process.
2006-09-15 17:15:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tommy D 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
But they did cheat! lol!
Stupid Devil worshiper.
2006-09-15 16:50:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
no,will go to the supreme court for that !!!!
2006-09-15 16:50:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
1⤋