im enjoying hearing the right stand behind a movie with so many disclaimers
2006-09-15 16:07:00 · 7 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It was a movie, like Fahrenheit 9/11, and like Fahrenheit it was a fictional account of an actual event.
2006-09-15 16:15:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Purely fiction, based on the lies of the 9/11 conmission report.
2006-09-18 10:35:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only those truly responsible for perpetrating the events of 9/11, we are made to believe, those lurking behind the smoke, mirrors and purple curtains of the state, can save and defend us from dark-skinned bogeymen of Arab/Muslim lineage that hate us for our freedoms and way of life.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14958.htm
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?bid=15&pid=121703
2006-09-15 23:39:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah. And they all like to bash us liberals for "whining" about it, and wanting to "sensor" it.
Conveniently, they have forgotten about CBS's movie on Regan. But that was lies, wasn't it? They weren't crying for "sensorship" on it - they just didn't want it on the air.
2006-09-15 23:12:06 · answer #4 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It put studio Gibli to shame!
2006-09-15 23:14:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
denial is not a river in egypt, you god clinton is and was a failure
2006-09-15 23:09:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Is your question retarded or latently homosexual?
2006-09-15 23:09:09 · answer #7 · answered by Paladin 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋