not let the partys form around individual thought that gain public suport other than party benifiting thought that is sold to individuals . be free thinkers and make your party work for you dont be an employee to your party ?
does this make sense to those with an education or does this way of thought only prove I am uneducated ?
2006-09-15 14:04:17 · 11 answers · asked by matthew_yelle 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ok dems dis like cons and then theres th libs well dont they all work for us or do they manipulate us to work for them by playing on our individual morals and as that may be the case then are we not responsable for the lack of improvments our government makes and with that said do I dare take it to the next step and state that becuase the government works for us the people then are they not subbject to termination as we are if we dont do our jobs properly why should they be able to remain in positions they have proven unable to preform
it like a hospital hiring a heart surgen and 3 out 5 patent die the doctor say hey its a risky prosedure and the hospital says ok try to improve your mortality rate and well give you till the rest of your contract to show some improvement well what if the doctor is the pres and the hospital is the United states there are laws in place if we will unit and proove incompatence
2006-09-15 14:20:20 · update #1
there is enogh to demand a grand jury investigation a unilaterall bipartisian jury of experts in inturpeting the the laws that have founded this great country or is that going to fall victim to you conspiracy nuts who think this as another way to fog the importance of seeking answers that are being kept quiet "if it is secret and elit it is defanetly corrupt" I wish I knew who said it it was something my grandfatheer told me about ,and if its corrupt then it can be manipulated and if it can be manipulated it has no place in a democratic government
2006-09-15 14:27:57 · update #2
Matthew in the US, it is a winner takes all system. A throed party is a spoiler; that's how Clinton got in the 1st time. 2nd Both parties recently have given poor candidates to chose from.
The way we craft our laws is also partly the problem. We don't make them one good idea one law. The politicians stick in unrelated items just so they aren't accountable. They then can say I voted for X because it was so important I had to allow Y even tho it was bad. Make the politicians accountable, each item stand on its own merit.
In my life time few presidents have had a vision for this country. It is unlikely our next one will either. Hopefully it isn't one that preaches even more entitlements.
2006-09-15 14:27:06 · answer #1 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In this country, one party has had control for so long, they can't believe they lost it.(40 years). They are so upset that they spend all their time berating the president and anyone who supports him. Failng in the mean time to formulate a plan of their own to present for consideration. To make matters worse, they have been taken over by a far left movement and this is also frustrating them..so, having no balanced forming of ideas, they remain in aquandry as to what to do about anything, other than complain about the ins of the moment.
2006-09-15 21:15:32 · answer #2 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because as the old saying goes "two minds are better than one" when people act as thinking for the group as a whole they are challenged rather allowed to runway speech which has yet be tried and challenged.Group thinking processes errors by for-seeing different points of view as no two minds think alike.As long as the outcome is positive, individual thinking is needed to bring about new ideas in which another has no insight.Power lye's in multitude.
2006-09-15 21:14:54 · answer #3 · answered by I don't get it 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I am reading you right, you're suggesting that Americans refrain from party platforms. In other words, vote for who you want and trash the platform. I think most Americans don't follow platforms anyway. Just getting Americans to vote is a major struggle.
2006-09-15 21:08:30 · answer #4 · answered by sean1201 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Generalization is too common, such as Mexicans being referred as illegal when in fact many Mexicans are here legally. It is far more easier to judge as a group than to judge on individuality.
2006-09-15 21:10:55 · answer #5 · answered by Enterrador 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
education is irrelevant in this matter Did you ever hear the song "It's My Party" and I'll cry if I want to" is that where you're going?
2006-09-15 21:14:16 · answer #6 · answered by razor 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it take far less effort, and far less thought, to just attack the entire group with mindless labels, rather than actually address the issues on their merits.
2006-09-15 21:05:46 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
How did you get that to end without a question mark?
2006-09-15 21:07:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
cor...took the words right out of my mouth, he is right as usual
2006-09-15 21:07:46 · answer #9 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your question is so poorly written, it really does not make much sense. Can you reward it so that it does/
Chow!!
2006-09-15 21:07:12 · answer #10 · answered by No one 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋