now a days we are coming across several stories according to which bush's government authored 9/11 with the sole purpose to invade iraq and afghanisthan to control oil. the usa had the history of spending 400m dollors in latin america to spread terrorist activities against their elected governments.it faced humiliating defeat in vietnam.whose version is correct? version of the usa govt or of voices questioning the bush's statement that al qaeda doctored it?
2006-09-15 06:10:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
also so they could take away constitutional rights.
and this isn't the first time something like this has been done, Hitler staged an attack on one of his cities, so did Stalin, Pearl Harbor was staged, the tonkin bay incident....
2006-09-15 06:14:46 · answer #1 · answered by phalsephasod 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not sure. And the "9-11" Commission didn't even come close to answering some of the questions, (some brought up subsequently), that make the Dumbya Coup squirm. That's why they didn't want it in the first place, then tried to sell Kissinger as the head. What it comes down to is whether they are hiding gross incompetence or something FAR more evil.
2006-09-15 06:46:29 · answer #2 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Got that off the FAR left's web site did you?
Two quick questions:
What motive could the US Government have to instigate 9/11?
If Oil WAS the motive why are troops even worried about any insurgents? There are enough troops to make sure only authorized people get anywhere near the pipelines and refineries.
And remember Nam was a Democrat deal 100% when most of the troops died.
2006-09-15 06:17:27 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dude, get hold of David Ray Griffin's e book, "The 9/11 fee report: A 571-website Lie" go away the Farenheit 9/11 toddler video on my own, that doesn't make an accusation in any respect approximately involvement by utilising the U. S. Gov. additionally, you will hit upon a pair movies online by utilising the call of unfastened exchange, you have prolly already considered them. they have some good information and questions in them. in case you % a mainstream little bit of background, hit upon a duplicate of the action picture Flight ninety 3 that aired on A&E (no longer the theatrical launch United ninety 3), and watch the final 2 minutes. The firefighters are arriving on the scene in Pennsylvania, and physique of strategies 2 FBI brokers, asking the place the wreckage is, to which the brokers respond with some thing like "what wreckage? you hit upon the damn airplane" The "respected tale" is so for sure pretend it is sounds loony. additionally verify out the present petitionchronic in NYC to get a query on the pollthis fall to open a clean self sustaining finished examine on the WTC assaults. have exciting with the duty, do no longer enable it depress you, our united states has consistently executed this to lead us into conflict. it is been shown conclusively some years later now that the united statesMaine became sunk by utilising an onboard detonation, to start the Spanish-American conflict. The Lusitania became allowed to be sunk as a prelude to the U. S. entering WWI. The Gulf of Tonkin incident became found by utilising our Congress to have been a lie, and it have been given us totally engaged in Vietnam. The "toddlers in incubators" tale that fired up individuals for the 1st Iraq conflict, is now conventional to be an outright lie. it is what we do. Us regular individuals do no longer % to flow to conflict, so we could consistently be fooled into it.
2016-11-07 09:38:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
since the administration was only in place since january of 2001 im sure they came up with the 9/11 plan in just a few months....i mean it is George Dubya he could mastermind a plan like this in less than a year in the first year of his presidency......lol....yeah right!
2006-09-15 06:19:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This was an attack by Islamic terrorist, nothing else. go to www.911myths.com to get the evidence you are in search of. These conspiracy theorist are cracked in the head on this one.
2006-09-15 06:15:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
If they were given to such conspiracies do you not think it would have been an better idea for them to plant WMDs in Iraq?
2006-09-15 06:13:06 · answer #7 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
May God take care of us...because the government...
2006-09-15 06:13:00 · answer #8 · answered by tatal_nostru2006 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Kool aid time!
2006-09-15 06:13:35 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Gee, never heard this stupid question before, must be a lib!
2006-09-15 06:13:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋