English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is this just another indication of their lack of knowledge and why they are so easily led?

2006-09-15 05:45:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

You had better call me "sir" madsky!

2006-09-15 05:53:05 · update #1

7 answers

The subject of the first question you asked was investigated almost 4 1/2 years ago. The results were published and reported on. This was the first of the conspiracy theories to appear. Plus since I'm not a neocon, I didn't feel I should answer the question since you're looking for the opinion of Reagan democrats.

2006-09-15 05:53:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'm not even American, I just answered the question you asked. As far as I can tell (using knowledge of the stock market and common sense) the drop was already expected to come - it just happened to be a lot more than expected due to 9/11.

If you're so fixated on this conspiracy theory why don't you look at the put volume for the past 5 years at the start of September... oh, look at that - the trend's the same! Imagine...

2006-09-15 12:59:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The heads of CIA linked investment companies like Deutsche Bank Alex Brown know what a "put" is.

http://www.bilderberg.org

2006-09-15 14:27:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No sir just the smart ones ignore your lame questions. Want to explain what a butterfly spread is and why I would use it without looking it up on line?

2006-09-15 12:50:17 · answer #4 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 3 0

They don't know what a put is or a call or straddle or future or a commodity spot or a pass-through security or a VUL. Neocons don't know what neoconservatism is. They just get wrapped up in God and the Flag and think Bush has the same opinions they do.

2006-09-15 12:48:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

I guess you're right. I don't know what a "put" is unless you are talking about the verb. And this doesn't even depend on what you're definition of "is" is.

2006-09-15 12:52:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

it must be because the only thing that came to mind is....HUH!?!

2006-09-15 12:49:48 · answer #7 · answered by LKJOHIO 2 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers