The public will then support our invasion and we will be able to kill thousands of children and women. It worked 5 years ago!!!!!
2006-09-14 09:18:38 · 10 answers · asked by Jonathan N 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Iraq was a potential threat, but Iran is already a threat.
We haven't done anything to Iraq because they are being supported by Russia, North Korea and China. They probably have nuclear weapons already. Why should we wait until we lose a city? If it is oil we are worried about, let's drill Alaska and convert our coal to oil. We can do it and get off the Middle East's crack pipe of oil. We only need to believe in ourselves and not wimp out. Let the Russians and Chinese keep their oil. We won't need them or any of the Middle Eastern oil if we get our priorities straight.
If we did this we wouldn't need to be in the Middle East. Then we could untie Israel's hands and let her nuke the hell out of the terrorist nations that seek to destroy her. That is what it is going to take to bring peace to that region.
Peace through victory!
2006-09-14 09:20:42 · answer #1 · answered by I'm alive .. still 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Demolishing another building simply won't work. It will take an even bigger event to mobilize public support for an Iranian invasion. Unless the propaganda machine works. And it seems to be.
2006-09-14 16:37:33 · answer #2 · answered by KO 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Go get sober...9/11 conspiracies make me tired, but don't worry, you'll get your Iranian invasion anyway. You can smell it in the air...big W is winding up to pull the trigger. I give it until Christmas--maybe--before it starts in motion.
It's a good thing for W that he's too stupid to play chess...he telegraphs every move he makes and you can see him coming from a mile away. America is lucky he was elected after we became the only superpower and could basically afford for him to fumble around the globe like it is his sandbox...
2006-09-14 18:48:38 · answer #3 · answered by Mark M 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all, the US government did NOT have a hand in 9/11. Secondly, it is NOT the military's goal to kill women and children.
Third, Iran IS a threat, and I don't think that if a war occurs, we'll need an "excuse" to go after them.
2006-09-14 16:24:32 · answer #4 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Stick to the facts LOSER.
You want to talk about targeting women and children, have a conversation with your friendly neighborhood terrorist.
Just another fool in the wilderness.
2006-09-14 16:34:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Have you ever considered the possiblility of jumping off a cliff for enjoyment...
2006-09-14 16:21:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
is this part of the Bush Doctrine
2006-09-14 16:20:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Do you even realize how stupid you are?
2006-09-14 16:19:58 · answer #8 · answered by anthony c 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
APPLAUSE!!!!!! FROM ME.
EXCELLENT POST!!
2006-09-14 16:21:41 · answer #9 · answered by mikeygonebad 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
wow...
2006-09-14 16:20:28 · answer #10 · answered by Tiler C 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋