9 11 was prepared before the us was looking for excuse to invade Iraq and Afghanistan.
2006-09-11 09:25:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The conspiracy theories on 9-11 make a little sense, but they all become extremely "maybe if" towards the end.
I'm pretty sure they were hijacked.
And I can't help but wonder where that 4th plane was headed before it crashed in Pennsylvania.
Instead of watching that dumb movie on ABC, you shoulda watched the 9-11 special on CBS last night. Real live footage of what it was like minutes before the collapses, and the dusty aftermaths.
2006-09-11 16:29:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by jaike 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, I believe it was Arab terrorist who were responsible. But one thing I will always question and find rather odd was how rapidly our government released all the details of these hijackers to the media. It's almost as if they knew in advance who was going to do the attacking. Very disburbing.
I've seen enough specials covering 9/11 to remind me what happened. I refused to watch ABC's docudrama.
2006-09-11 16:35:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is so rediculous to actually think that it wasn't terrorists and planes. I saw them crash into the towers. The towers collapsed because steel beams were weakened due to the fire. The terrorists admitted they did it. It is so obvious, I don't even know why I bothered to reply except that I keep hearing this. To me it is the same as those who claim we didn't land on the moon.
2006-09-11 16:26:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by JimZ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Once again, I work in a hotel half mile from The Pentagon. The plane flew right over my hotel. I saw the shadow of it, and my engineers who were working on the roof saw it hit the Pentagon.
NOT A BOMB, An Airplane. Get over it. No conspiracy theories. It was a plane.
2006-09-11 16:23:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Leah 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
That FBI informant Randy Glass, working an undercover sting, was told by Pakistani intelligence operatives that the World Trade Center towers were coming down, and that his repeated warnings which continued until weeks before the attacks, including the mention of planes used as weapons, were ignored by federal authorities, is simply one of the many "What Ifs" of that tragic day.
That over the summer of 2001 Washington received many urgent, senior-level warnings from foreign intelligence agencies and governments - including those of Germany, France, Great Britain, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Morocco, Afghanistan and others - of impending terror attacks using hijacked aircraft and did nothing, demonstrates the pressing need for a new Intelligence Czar.
That John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial aircraft in July 2001 on account of security considerations had nothing to do with warnings regarding September 11, because he said so to the 9/11 Commission.
That former lead counsel for the House David Schippers says he’d taken to John Ashcroft’s office specific warnings he’d learned from FBI agents in New York of an impending attack – even naming the proposed dates, names of the hijackers and the targets – and that the investigations had been stymied and the agents threatened, proves nothing but David Schipper’s pathetic need for attention.
That Garth Nicolson received two warnings from contacts in the intelligence community and one from a North African head of state, which included specific site, date and source of the attacks, and passed the information to the Defense Department and the National Security Council to evidently no effect, clearly amounts to nothing, since virtually nobody has ever heard of him.
That in the months prior to September 11, self-described US intelligence operative Delmart Vreeland sought, from a Toronto jail cell, to get US and Canadian authorities to heed his warning of his accidental discovery of impending catastrophic attacks is worthless, since Vreeland was a dubious character, notwithstanding the fact that many of his claims have since been proven true.
2006-09-11 16:22:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by dstr 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6596630292015140276&q=screw+loose+change&hl=en
And i have watched so much conspiracy stuff that i believed it for a while.
Then i watched the opposing view, did some research, and made my own judgement.
Hint: My judgement is that people who made up conspiracy theories are in it for the money, and the people that believe are way to impressionable, that they will only believe certain things if it makes their life more exciting. Is that why you believe?
2006-09-11 16:26:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Don't let your politicians think for you either, there is no reason that the planes would have brought down the towers on their own.
2006-09-11 16:23:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Roland D. 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
They freakin' bragged about it. The "Magnificent 19" they called them.
Grow a brain and don't believe everything some idiot puts in front of you.
2006-09-11 16:24:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by b4_999 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes Arabs did it
Dont believe everything you see on TV
2006-09-11 16:27:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋