Global Warming is a myth.
The planet goes through cycles of warming and cooling. Ice Ages produce massive glacial coverage. These cycles have (and will again) kept the Sahara transforming between the desert of today and the savanna it has been in the past.
Cooling temperatures in the 1970 led to the rise of a "Global Cooling" thoery, which was disproven much quicker, but should show the misleading methodology of climatological disaster theories.
2006-09-11 07:09:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jim T 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Um, the hole in the ozone layer and global warming are two entirely different climate issues. If you're going to try to be clever and sarcastic, you might want to get some of your facts straight so that you don't look like an azzhole. Which of course, now you do.
2006-09-11 06:56:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your questions just doesnt make sense. Please add footnote to your comments so we know you are not just ranting with your bitchery. It just doesnt have any facts in your claim that your are a libertarian.
Ok, to answer your question in a way i thought you meant to ask, if you would be bothered at all that is, Its a "scientific fact" that CO2 leads to warming of the atmosphere because it traps the infra red rays (the heat) from the sunlight. That's a given and no one can disprove that. However, there is lots of debate about the catasthrophic events that it might ensure if these emmisions are not controlled. Its not a given because it hasnt been substancially proven.
Ozone hole you mentioned is a topic way off from your concern. Read a book please.
2006-09-11 07:25:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by john s 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a witty answer. Wait a minute...aren't you supposed to be asking valid questions? Well, I don't think you are capable of doing so, so I'll let you slide.
Little science lesson...when humans exhale, carbon dioxide is recycled into breathable oxygen. Greenhouse gasses are made by un-natural sources like factories or cars. So even your smart-*** statement doesn't hold water.
2006-09-11 07:00:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by bluejacket8j 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
carbon dioxide and monoxide are the significant motives of the international warming CO2 is produced with the help of vehicles factories burning stuff etc. yet CO2 isn't continuously a topic to illustrate if the international has a various flowers CO2 would not be a topic yet because of people various flowers are lengthy gone Carbon monoxide is produced also in vehicles and in case you lighted a candle and putted a jar on it it truly is going to produce CO witch is poisonous
2016-11-26 01:21:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by mcgray 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush refused to sign the Kyoto Agreement. Mostly it is the fault of the republicans for things like this, dirty energy, gas-guzzling vehicles etc.
2006-09-11 07:49:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i guess i found a lamer attempt on the web to start some bashing and it happened to be by the same person.
Kudos for your immaturity.
2006-09-11 06:56:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by zonumb 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Drink some more of yourself and have another toke, dude. We're part of the ecosystem and you are a republican. That is your answer.
2006-09-11 06:58:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tabulah Erassa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We all are....if there is in fact Global Warming.
2006-09-11 06:55:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
WOW!!! You just surprise me. Whenever I think you can't get any dumber.
2006-09-11 07:03:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by darkemoregan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋