It's all corruption and back door deals at the highest level, the common denomanator being $$$$, As far as Gov't goes, trust no one.;
2006-09-11 05:31:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr.Feelgood 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they were not acting on the behalf of Saudi Arabia, nor was their action supported by the government of Saudi Arabia, nor was their terrorist group accepted by the Saudis. These people were acting on behalf of Osama and his cult of death. Osama is also a Saudi, but has been disowned and banished from the Kingdom.
Osama and his followers were operating out of Afghanistan at the time, protected and supported by the Taliban.
Sadly, there is a high level of cluelessness to your question and your subsequent rant.
2006-09-11 11:57:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bcoz the Bushes have very close ties with the Saudi royal family. No doubt all that hate idealogy, funding originates from Saudia Arabia and Pakistan, infact these two countries were the main backers of Taliban before 911.
2006-09-11 11:52:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by ash_m_79 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
listen man, i am a saudi arabian, and i was in USA studying when 9-11 happened. what happened to USA is very tragic, i don't support it, what those terrorists did was wrong, they committed suicide and killed innocent people. i would appreciate it if you don't stereotype saudis. saudis are very good and nice people, but every country have those kind of bad people. here, we watch american tv, listen to american music, eat american food, etc... you get the idea. we are allies with the USA. so at the end.. what i'm saying is.. stereotyping people is wrong, every country have criminals, even USA. timothy mccvay was a terrorist, wasn't he? he killed all those innocent children. also.. spain has this terrorist group that's against their government, what i'm saying is.. not just because we are Muslims, that doesn't mean we are terrorists, we are just normal people like you who try to enjoy life and live it good. i hope this gives you an idea about us. good luck man.
2006-09-11 12:01:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by lomatar1186 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just because they were Saudi doesn't mean Saudi Arabia was behind it, any more than the US was behind Oklahoma City because they were Americans.
2006-09-11 11:51:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by James 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
because your nation can't afford to miss with a country like saudi arabia.
2006-09-11 23:25:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by ruh . 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
americans funded and supplied weapons to irish terrorists , that killed british soldiers and civilians, then refused extradition back to britain when caught in the u s . Does that mean britain should be at war with america , i dont think so
2006-09-11 12:15:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by MITCHELL B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ahhh they are all the same down there....I think it's there believes not there origin my dear!
2006-09-11 11:54:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by CC Top 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
And Pakistan's role?????WTF
2006-09-11 11:50:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
1⤊
0⤋