Sadam is considered a cruel, death deserving dictator because he killed and maimed people in Iraq. Bush on the other hand is the American benevolent leader because he has not done so to his people but he had gladly killed and maimed civilians in Iraq.
2006-09-10 18:12:46 · 8 answers · asked by Kee 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The difference is: Bush has weapons of mass destruction.
2006-09-10 18:18:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
He also put our soldiers in harms way for a WAR that we didn't have to fight at this time . We should have sent all the soldiers to Afghanistan , to catch Bin Laden . Now look where we are at .
All because of Bush's Shamefully Invasion of Iraq . He led us in the wrong direction .
2006-09-11 01:27:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of the insurgents in Iraq aren't actually Iraqis, they are from Saudi Arabia and are just trying to stir up trouble.
2006-09-11 01:20:30 · answer #3 · answered by nighthawk8713 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sadam is akind of Hitler whose ambition was thwarted by Bush.
It was the complacency about Hitler led to 2nd world war. Prevention is better tha cure is it not?
2006-09-11 01:27:42 · answer #4 · answered by Brahmanda 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
saddam or bush?
if you are asking who's the better one, i cant answer that coz you gave two terrorists... that have done nothing else but to contest for superiority and anihilate innocent human beings!
2006-09-11 01:18:58 · answer #5 · answered by plutoeffesus 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Both Idiot who fighting for revenge. Bus I think he is worse then saddam.
2006-09-11 01:15:05 · answer #6 · answered by tangind 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Saddam is sadist. don't compare with bush
2006-09-11 01:18:36 · answer #7 · answered by adraya 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
that is democracy
2006-09-11 01:19:04 · answer #8 · answered by guharamdas 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋