With the establishment of the facts that Iraq was not developing nor in possesion of WMD and that Iraq was not in league with Osama and his band of insane fanatics; does this then imply that USA could also have irresponsible and fanatic leader that would endanger the world as much as we fear the rise of fanatic leaders in the Muslim world ?
2006-09-10 17:41:48 · 14 answers · asked by Kee 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That's how much of the world views us. The Bush Admin has a lot to do with it at this time in the present situation and has alienated much of the world. But the US has been meddling in other countries governments for decades. We have been taught to view this as helping other countries avoid communism. But our "help" has not improved life in those countries, so those people just view is as meddling.
2006-09-10 17:51:53 · answer #1 · answered by Artsy Lady 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
United States Of America has always tried to have a World Peace. It always appealed both the nations who have a problem with each other. It always believe in solving the issues with talks. U.S.A. has did those thing that can happen only in Dreams. People in Iraq and Afghanistan are tasting a real taste of the Democracy. Initially there is a problem with the domestic violence but ultimately it will lead both the countries to great heights of democracy and that's' what America Want . You will only taste the sweetness of the democracy unless and until you have a experience of dictatorship or Bureaucracy.
2006-09-11 00:56:13 · answer #2 · answered by pesific_boy_curious_2_no 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No asswipe. Iraq had WMD's Mustard gas with which he murdered his own people. That is a WMD, and he also had other gases ready and available, or do you just consider a nuke a WMD. Our leaders do not blow up airplanes, strap bombs to our young men to blow up innocent people. If you can't tell the difference then you are a menace to our country. You have got to be a liberal with that kind of question.
2006-09-11 01:02:39 · answer #3 · answered by hexa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have it backwards,,
heartless men who gas there own people,,
kill other people in the name of genocide,
men who kill children, and women in the name of a pathetic god,
men who disregard The common good in the name of a common pathetic goal.
they should all be destroyed. The US shouldnt have to be the only ones lookin after the world. But if they do nothing,, this disease will go on living, and killing.
i dont hate muslims, or sadam husain, or osama bin laden,
but I DO, and Everyone should hate what they do.
they should be held acountable, and be taken out of the human equation before We find them in our own backyard.
You forget, we didnt start a war,, they did.
Sadam was a fanatic,, a hitler, a disease. We didnt do anything about him when he invaded Kuwait did we? Did we do anything when he gassed his own people? Who the Freak cares if he had WMD or not. We probably saved millions already.
the media sucks *** when it comes to publishing the truth,, do you believe everything you see and hear? if you do, you are the biggist puppet that the world has ever seen
2006-09-11 00:49:23 · answer #4 · answered by Jazz Q 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes, America should be stronger , whenever a country needs help who do they ask? Who helps the population of war torn countries with food, medical supplies and peace keepers to protect the citizens. Who tries to bring a end to these wars. I ask you what would the world do if America wasnt here?
2006-09-11 01:09:01 · answer #5 · answered by santee s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to answer your question in line 1: just the opposite. without a strong, and i mean superpower strong, the world would be in chaos.
is is the military strength os the us along with of the rest of the free world that keeps tyrants in check e.g.kim song (mentally)il.
we are the main force that will prevail over the islamofacists.
iran must not get the bomb. period.
2006-09-11 00:51:44 · answer #6 · answered by arkie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you would like to live in a place where the US "minds its own business" and does not get involved militarily, I hear there is plenty of space available in Rwanda, Congo, and Zimbabwe. You can live in peace from America over there.
2006-09-11 00:57:25 · answer #7 · answered by Zak 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Excellent question and I agree. Just look at what the neo-cons have done to our country in six short years and a consistent 40% of the population think they're wonderful. This country could lose its greatness in no time at all. Pray, I say, pray.
2006-09-11 00:49:24 · answer #8 · answered by Babs 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes if US continues to act irresponsibily for self interest ONLY without due regards to international concensus.
2006-09-11 00:53:59 · answer #9 · answered by Roti-Prata 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
America has been a hindrance to world peace for a long time. Just take a look at how many times America has vetoed peace resolutions in the U.N.
2006-09-11 00:43:28 · answer #10 · answered by reigning queen 4 · 4⤊ 5⤋