Since this happened only a month into Clinton's first term in office, it could be said that G.W. Bush was too preoccupied with his re-election at a time that he should have been on top of this terrorist plot. As former Director of the CIA, one would have expected more from him. I think that in light of things, maybe all of this should lay squarely on the shoulders of Dubya's Daddy.
2006-09-10 16:53:13 · 20 answers · asked by edaem 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
well he could,, but he is to much of a man,,,,
2006-09-10 16:55:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
dubya's daddy isn't someone you should joke around about.
All roads lead to GHWB, most through Darth Cheney, and they go WAY back into the '70's.
Careful what you wish for. Here there be monsters at the bottom of a slippery slope of conspiranoia.
For example: The Iran Contra trials on TV were kept within limits to keep from digging into the Iranian coup and the Reagan October Surprise---then the Whitewater story broke to end the Iran contra story---then the Monica Lewinski story broke to end the whitewater investigation before it reached the Mena airfield (where supposedly Clinton knew about the transfer of funds and coke for the Contras)--the election rigging story for GW broke to put an end to the Afghani pipeline story--9/11 happened to provide both a distraction from and reason for the Energy Task Force plan to get Iraq out of OPEC so that the prices could go up and stabilize (unfortunately, it worked TOO well, and now our economy is about to tank)...it never ends.......
2006-09-10 17:05:25 · answer #2 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It wasn't finger pointing time till Clinton did now no longer respond the subsequent 5 circumstances the U. S. or it is pastimes have been attacked! It replaced into then that the american human beings found out they had a shameless coward sitting interior the seat of the commander in chief. the full distinction between the 1st and extremely final incidents have been this: George Herbert Walker Bush replaced into out of place of labor whilst the 1st commerce center attack happened. This u . s . replaced into being examined by using Islamic terrorists, whilst the 1st attack happened, whilst the 2d WTC attack happened, under GWB, the terrorists already believed the country does not respond with the aid of reality it had now no longer, on the perfect 5 incidents. The precedent had already been set by using Clinton, to now no longer react to attack. the guy feared our very own protection tension complicated extra effective than he did the enemy. it is genuine, the protection tension had little regard for the Clintons, in spite of the undemanding reality that it does not have allowed it is dislike for them to intervene with it is protection tension household projects. You stated that the Clinton administration began working to maintain us maintain from terrorism, it is as a techniques fetched as a reality can possibly be. There thought of retaining the american human beings from terrorism replaced into to make certain the undertaking in civilian courts. it is so a techniques as Clinton ever went in struggling with the enemy of as we communicate. it is an identical enemy as that of 1993. particularly how deep interior the sand are you Clinton followers arranged to bury your heads, in the previous you will finally admit the Clintons are extra effective than particularly losers? they're volatile losers, with the aid of reality they think of they'd produce a win, win undertaking for all, and that particularly ain't so. between 1992 and 2000, we tried Clintons social try of being astounding to all of us. He grew to alter into the countless cheek, each time our u . s . replaced into attacked. Why, he finally ran out of cheeks to tutor, yet in spite of the undeniable fact that did now no longer some thing. So, do now no longer you dare tell the american people who we elect the Clinton's lower back, do now no longer you fu cking dare!
2016-12-12 06:18:30 · answer #3 · answered by erke 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
His daddy armed, trained, financed Bin Laden. Then decided to go into investments with his family. Before their was Dubya, and Clinton, there was the first Bush who started it all.
2006-09-10 17:03:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Some would say that would be fair. Pointing fingers never solved problems. Issues, not blame need to be discussed. They should be working together for this great nation instead of contributing the it's demise by the great divide of it's citizens through political affiliations.
2006-09-10 17:12:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Exactly! That's what they're trying to do to Clinton, trying to blame him for 9-11. That's just ludicrous!
If someone wants to believe that though, when would he have had the time when all the Republicans did his whole presidency was breathe down his neck about this woman and that woman and did he ahve an affair? They were more concerned about the latest woman than what was going on in the country.
2006-09-10 17:01:18 · answer #6 · answered by First Lady 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
That plot wasn't near as concise and drawn out as 9/11.
Maybe you should compare apples and oranges? Can we blame Clinton for the Recession in 2001? After all, his fiscal policy didn't end until Oct 2001.
2006-09-10 17:05:17 · answer #7 · answered by John Skerry II 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
9/11 wasn't about foreign policy it was just muslims attacking non muslims.
You see timmy, America is at the top of the food chain. The smelly arabs figured it would shake the world if they hit the primary target of the non muslim world. They were right. I'm not sure if they counted on the liberals in America pointing the finger at everyone but the muslims.
You see, muslims all over, everywhere, HATE YOU. Even if you are a gay liberal jew picketing for the end to the war in iraq, they hate you. They want you to die, or become muslim. You just sound retarded defending people who swear to kill you 5 times daily facing mecca.
2006-09-10 17:01:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It amazes me that you people think Clinton was this great president but instead of going after Bin Laden when he had the chance he was to busy getting a ******** under the table, typical man. Yeah what a great president Noooooooooot.
2006-09-10 17:44:34 · answer #9 · answered by Pink Butterfly 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Question is, what did Clinton do about it besides try to make this a police enforcement problem. What a joke!
2006-09-10 17:01:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
We all love Clinton, a good man and one of our greatest presidents. Clinton made me proud to be an American.
2006-09-10 17:01:05 · answer #11 · answered by p2prox 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋