2006-09-10 16:31:21 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LMAOROTF... I think your avatar explains the answer very well.
The ANALcrats have to have something in which they can continue their degeneration. Next, they'll be wanting to marry pets!
2006-09-10 17:13:19 · answer #1 · answered by John Skerry II 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
What is it with you neocons and John Kerry? He lost the 2004 election and he's not going to run again. What possible reason could you have to feel threatened by him? Could it be that you recognize that Bush is a failure and the only way you can console yourselves is to try to convince yourselves that Kerry would have been worse? Sorry, but that just isn't possible. There never has been and there never will be a worse president than GWB.
2006-09-11 01:58:30 · answer #2 · answered by ConcernedCitizen 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
John Kerry and John Edwards are just that secure with themselves.
Gay marriage is a form of freedom that democrats stand for and that republicans can only talk about.
2006-09-10 23:35:14 · answer #3 · answered by p2prox 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Liberals don't really act on what they believe is right or wrong, They say what they think will get them into power. It has been backfiring on them the last several years, so now Hillary the carpet muncher is NOW oppossed to gay marriage. They go with the polls and keep their fingers crossed. If a liberal ever got a backbone they might actually win.
2006-09-11 00:59:22 · answer #4 · answered by Ned B 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's called a platform, and they weren't very adament at all. Their platform was for civil unions, which is not marriage. They were making a big deal out of it in order to get votes.
2006-09-10 23:33:19 · answer #5 · answered by Cammie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Might've felt inspired by that underground blue movie starring Newt Gingrich's sister Candice and Dick Cheney's daughter, Mary. :)
That aside, Cammie makes a good case too.
2006-09-10 23:33:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They needed the votes of the gays.
2006-09-10 23:34:16 · answer #7 · answered by Eric H 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They wanted to make sure that Dick's daughter could get married
2006-09-10 23:37:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would rather have gays in committed relationships where they are not spreading AIDS and these people have rights too.
2006-09-10 23:37:42 · answer #9 · answered by redunicorn 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To win over gays' votes.
2006-09-10 23:36:25 · answer #10 · answered by xcrimsonxphoenixofxhellx 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋