English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WHY IS IT THE DEMOCRATS DON'T WANT THE MOVIE MINISERIES PATH TO 9/11 TO AIR ON ABC.

COULD IT BE THAT THEY ARE SUPPORTERS OF CLINTON OR MABYE THEY ARE HILLARY'S HENCHMEN WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO KEEP THE TRUTH FROM BEING KNOWN.

BOTH BUSH AND CLINTON FAILED IN THEIR DUTY TO PROTECT AMERICA. STOP BEING ONE SIDED BILL CLINTON IS JUST AS MUCH WRONG AS BUSH WAS.

STOP TRYOING TO IGNORE THE TRUTH.

(sorry fo yelling it just frustrates me to see clinton supporters trying to stop a movie mini series just because they say it is full of lies. it is not. clinton did fail as president as did bush .... so just grow up already and let it go!)

2006-09-10 15:25:52 · 12 answers · asked by lymber1 2 in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

IT WAS SHOWN TONIGHT! GET OVER IT!

2006-09-10 15:31:14 · answer #1 · answered by blued79 3 · 0 0

That one of George Bush's first acts as President, in January 2001, was to end the two-year deployment of attack submarines which were positioned within striking distance of al Qaeda's Afghanistan camps, even as the group's guilt for the Cole bombing was established, proves that a transition from one administration to the next is never an easy task.

That so many influential figures in and close to the Bush White House had expressed, just a year before the attacks, the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" before their militarist ambitions could be fulfilled, demonstrates nothing more than the accidental virtue of being in the right place at the right time.

That the company PTECH, founded by a Saudi financier placed on America’s Terrorist Watch List in October 2001, had access to the FAA’s entire computer system for two years before the 9/11 attack, means he must not have been such a threat after all.

That whistleblower Indira Singh was told to keep her mouth shut and forget what she learned when she took her concerns about PTECH to her employers and federal authorities, suggests she lacked the big picture. And that the Chief Auditor for JP Morgan Chase told Singh repeatedly, as she answered questions about who supplied her with what information, that "that person should be killed," suggests he should take an anger management seminar.

That on May 8, 2001, Dick Cheney took upon himself the job of co-ordinating a response to domestic terror attacks even as he was crafting the administration’s energy policy which bore implications for America's military, circumventing the established infrastructure and ignoring the recommendations of the Hart-Rudman report, merely shows the VP to be someone who finds it hard to delegate.

2006-09-10 22:29:44 · answer #2 · answered by dstr 6 · 2 0

It is not lies; it is fiction based on an actual event. The problem for politicians is that the movie makes certain point like a decision to capture bin Laden might be postponed because the politicians are afraid they might not have enough evidence to convict him in a court of law. What SHOULD be done is to forget about the court of law and kill him by any means possible. But a movie which brings up the issue that maybe, just maybe, he was never captured when there was a chance to do so just because some lawmakers feared there might not be enought legally-admissable evidence to convict in a court room is a damning dommentary on politicians and THIS is what they do not want to be brought out.

2006-09-10 22:32:31 · answer #3 · answered by Kokopelli 7 · 1 1

I agree with you. Al Qaeda was responsible for two bombings of American embassies in Africa and actually perpetrated their first attack on the World Trade Center during the Clinton administration. The Clinton administration did next to nothing to stop Al Qaeda from gaining strength and in fact supported Al Qaeda by siding with Al Qaeda terrorists during NATO's illegal aggression against Yugoslavia (which was done only to distract attention from the Monica Lewinsky situation)

2006-09-10 22:31:07 · answer #4 · answered by Benjamin 3 · 4 0

ignoring the Truth is what your promoting with your yelling look into the discrepancy's talk to those who were there and then inform yourself with all the facts before you start pointing fingers and displacing the blame i wish I was more computer smart to show you the answer to your rant but I don't know how to do the blue print thing and give you the history on bush and his background but if you do your own research I'm confident that you will rethink your rant trust me it is far better to do your own research before relying on bad information

2006-09-10 22:51:29 · answer #5 · answered by matthew_yelle 2 · 0 0

You fail to realize that there are many out and out lies in the movie. Allbright is shown as saying things George Tenant said, Clinton is shown as talking about lewinsky when they're trying to get his attention, bin laden is depicted as in plain site of people who say they never saw him.

so, grow up already and learn that people are lying to us. and some of us really don't want lies solidified by appearing in moving pictures.

it's an out and out lie, easily verified on google, that clinton did have bin laden and let him go. but, bush certainly allowed bin laden to escape to tora bora and now the pakistanis have signed an agreement not to hassle the tribal taliban supporters if they live nicely.

2006-09-10 22:36:54 · answer #6 · answered by cassandra 6 · 2 2

Actually, clinton was worse. Selling war secrets to China is be very very bad and just might cause more death than bush ever did.

2006-09-10 22:32:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

The maker of the movie is one of Rush Limbaugh`s friends and the movie has a agenda. I think Bush is more to blame, it happened under his watch.

2006-09-10 22:33:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Not true Clinton was worse then Bush he has Osama several times but let him go....

2006-09-10 22:33:04 · answer #9 · answered by freded_124 3 · 2 2

Dude, I agree. But one post is enough already.

2006-09-10 22:31:20 · answer #10 · answered by Amy H 3 · 1 0

wow

2006-09-10 22:29:47 · answer #11 · answered by Rusty Shackleford 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers