Thank God the people of this nation are coming around. This truly is good news, and yes he is that bad, if not worse. We need another FDR.
2006-09-10 13:46:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
This is all a matter of perspective. Depending on your stance on various issues will determine your answer. Throughout history, presidents have done things that people aren't happy with. How do you decide what makes them the worst ever?
If you dislike slavery, then our first several presidents would be the worst because they had slaves (and in fact one for sure had children with his slaves). Adultery, theft, etc. can all be found in presidential closets.
If you are referring to their decisions, do you truly believe you would do a better job? Are the actions a result of their issues or are they fixing what has been made wrong by their predecessors?
I won't say he is the best one we have ever had, but can I say he is the worst. Probably not. Just not exactly Mr. Popularity.
2006-09-10 13:49:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sw. Caroline 29 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Went to Yale University were he averaged only a 72 average in college which is down from the 73 he had in high school.
Often accused of being the downfall of the country. And to back it up he....
*Has the largest deficit this country has ever had.
*More years were the country los money than won money.
*Took money from school to fund the war(which is another mess on its own)Than declined doing so
*turned the economy into ****.
*Reacted and prepared poorly to hurricane katrina (never stopped his vacation)
*refused to give seaports to a group of men because they were Arab
*Goes by the spoils system and hires underqualified friends to do his job.
*Stole the 2000 election
*froze like a dead dog in a debate againts Kerry (How the hell did he win?)
But when you call out the prez for one of his screw ups he simply dances around the issue until you give up.
2006-09-10 13:50:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. Just in terms of polling numbers, Truman's was worse at one time. If they did accurate polling at the time, I think Lincoln at some point during his presidency would've been worse.
1. Not true, it's been remarkably stable considering the dot-com bust and 9/11.
2. It's actually below 5%. That's good! It's considered near full employment by economists. The jobless rate during the Clinton administration was about the same.
3. Are, actually.
4. OK. Point.
5. Not true. Democrats are doing this.
6. Wrong.
2006-09-10 13:47:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Will 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
No, you are lucky to have him. If we get a Democrat president, you can be sure there will be a city nuked. Sorry you dummies can't deal with reality.
By the way, 5% unemployment is actually good. And especially with 400 billions illegals allegedly taking all our jobs away, this seems to be a miracle.
2006-09-10 13:48:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by retiredslashescaped1 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
The Worse Ever.
2006-09-10 13:46:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Later Me 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
NO it's not true that latest polls show Bush as the worst President ever? and he's not as bad as everybody thinks?
2006-09-10 13:49:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by purpleaura1 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
his more stupid
then a monkey
a genocide war criminal
vetoing stemm cell bill? tha can cure countless milions evry year?
i really hope there is a hell he sure will spend eternity there
2006-09-11 15:06:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hes the worst in my lifetime, JFK was the first.
My guess is that makes him the worst ever.
2006-09-10 13:47:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by DelusionRoad 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
he is as bad or as good as the individual thinks
2006-09-10 15:50:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋