2006-09-10 13:14:06 · 16 answers · asked by po8t1 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes I do mostly for failing to abide by the Geneva Convention with the prison at Gitmo,Cuba. He has been cited by the Supreme Court three times now over it, so there is plenty of documentation.
2006-09-10 13:20:38 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 19⤊ 1⤋
There was no war crime. You might want to look up sights where there are actual experts on the Geneva Conventions and who it applies to for the answer to this question. Also, you may want to look up the Genocide Convention. Did you know it's a crime for a country to sit around and watch Genocide occur? Like Saddam slaughtering the Kurds and Shia? This is the exact reason the UN refuses to call what's going on in the Sudan genocide.
2006-09-10 20:17:30 · answer #2 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
mel t a joke and a bad example if it is a war crime to sit by and watch genoside then in your words bush is guilty of sitting by and encouraging isreal to devastate an entire country to route out a miniority political party for the kiddnaping of 2 soldiers when isreal has held 20,00 lebonise citizens to include woman and children for over 15 years so when is the trial mel t
2006-09-10 20:28:21 · answer #3 · answered by matthew_yelle 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He hasn't committed genocide. He hasn't slaughtered civilians. He hasn't beheaded any prisoners. He hasn't carpetbombed civilian areas. What would you like him tried for?
Ramsey Clark, from international answer, began the war crimes bandwagon. He defended Milosivic a few years back. Must be looking for a new client.
2006-09-10 20:29:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
To be tried for war crimes you have to commit them yourself or directly order someone to do something illegal
Bush has done neither
Invading Iraq is not enough
2006-09-10 20:16:40 · answer #5 · answered by knmardix 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why? I think Bush is doing a fine job.
http://www.fdnylodd.com/BloodofHeroes.html
2006-09-10 20:20:07 · answer #6 · answered by ally_oop_64 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I do. First he invaded Iraq because of WMD's, but when he couldnt find them it was to liberate the people from Saddam. Yea like Iraq is doing any better now that Saddams gone. If you want to liberate and help people, theres a lot of countrys in Africa much worse off than Iraq, oh yea but THERES NO OIL there, so whats the point?
2006-09-10 20:40:54 · answer #7 · answered by furly356 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes!
2006-09-10 22:03:56 · answer #8 · answered by The Idealist 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More likely you will be tried for being on the Internet.
2006-09-10 20:26:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not me.Liberals should be tried and hanged by the neck for high treason though.
2006-09-10 20:24:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋