Many Conspiracy theorists say that Al Qaeda would never be able to carry off such attacks. Now Al Qaeda types are releasing tapes showing them training for the attacks, are they trying to convince us that we really need to fear them? Of course some say that even those tapes are bogus. If their purpose is to scare us does it frustrate them when so many don’t even believe in their capacity to attack us? I think that those theories are ludicrous but if they p!ss Osama off, well that is a silver lining in my opinion.
2006-09-10
10:08:25
·
13 answers
·
asked by
scarlettt_ohara
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Okay Mr Me! Osama or Ayman al Zawahri who really his the master mind of it all.
2006-09-10
10:13:14 ·
update #1
Mr. Oly, as explained by Popular Mechanics top guys, the steel did not need to MELT for the building to collapse, it just had to SOFTEN a little.
2006-09-10
10:16:37 ·
update #2
Maybe it confuses him more because a few think they had nothing to do with it and many are worried he'll do it again. I hope he doesn't think he has to do something worse to convince us. Maybe the conspiracists are really the CIA plants on site like this one to screw Osama up. Very clever!
2006-09-10 10:11:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The attack on America by 19 hijackers shocked the world. It was Ayman Zawahiri’s new strategy, implemented in a brutal and spectacular way. But neither he nor bin Laden were the originators of what was called the “Planes Operation.” It was the brainchild of an Islamist militant called Khalid Sheik Mohammed, who came to bin Laden for funding and help in finding volunteers. But in the wake of panic created by the attacks, the politicians reached for the model which had been created by the trial earlier that year( the al qaeda trainee who said that the organisation could do all that but later confessed that he said so so that he could get a milder prison sentence and made up by recalling the movie "godzilla" he saw in afghanistan). The Neocon created the exaggerated myth that the hijackers were just the tip of a vast, international terrorist network which was called, “Al Qaeda.”
By that time, americans have actually created a "network" of its own. Made this group from an obscure fundamentalist idea to most feared and broadcasted "cells".
2006-09-10 10:50:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by john s 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Osama is Jhon Wilkes Booth of right wing Arabic terrorist groups. There are many more operating cells that are just as or more capable of carrying out attacks on their enemies. Osama is a tabloid, the bogyman of the middle east. Complacency is something that an enemies can exploit. Confusion and fear as well as ignorance are also weapons. Personally I hope that people would simply ignore the hype and indulgence of worry and simply stay level headed and watch for suspicious activities in the real world of their daily lifes. Ask what their Representatives can do to not only protect but educate our public beyond the rantings of most news programs.
2006-09-10 10:36:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yours is a twisted kind of question with an interesting angle to it.
In a world full of gadgets and robots and all kinds of espionage items, how can one standing six foot five and wearing a long white robe not be seen?
I tell you, it sounds like somebody is making it all up just to keep people on edge and also keeping the economy going.
I try to avoid this issue because I don't think we know enough about it, but it certainly looks peculiar.
The power and force that America has stashed is capable of turning countries into dust in a blink of an eye, so why did we become so feeble minded trying to figure out what this tall freak can be up to?
Doesn't make sense. I wrote 70 chapters on 9/11, and I think I have some sound ideas who's behind this.
A major crime has been committed, and nobody is pursueing the part of getting down to the nitty gritty and bringing the right criminals to be executed. It's become like a giant O.J. Simpson freak show. He was the prelude.
And Bush reminds me of Elmer Fudd, pursueing the wabbit stealing carrots, with a big old gun but never getting Bugs Bunny.
A joke. A damn rotten joke!
2006-09-10 10:16:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i do no longer think of Obama's call should not be interior the question. The question ought to study Who injury the U. S. extra economically, BUSH or Osama. All indexed decrease than replaced into no longer began with the help of Obama, yet Bush. Rep. has been the reason for all the will for the upward push interior the cost variety. I wander how lots of the richer than prosperous could have jumped out of a window if Obama does not have carried out what he did. My question is what number white Republicans does it take to get one Black president out of place of work?
2016-11-07 01:30:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
More than Osama, the Americans are more frustrated at not being able to capture and punish him for his evil deeds. Osama has already done more than his share of damage so why should he be frustrated. We are the ones who are frustrated ,for not being able to capture him.
2006-09-10 10:16:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by The Inquisitive 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
All Osama needs to do is keep hiding. By that he proves that a multi-billion dollar invasion into Afghanistan to catch one man was a complete failure. He's a smart SOB.
2006-09-10 10:11:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by quickblur 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The media may show that the Taliban is losing it's influence,but there's a few "wanna-be's" out there wanting to make a name for themselves by attacking the U.S. or one of our allies.
2006-09-10 10:14:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
read this. this is what the professor from brigham young university was suspended for. read it yourself and judge its legitimacy. this offers what the right hates the most: true intelligence.
addendum: the steel used to construct the buildings melt at 800 degrees fahrenheit. the diesel fuel in the jetliners could not have reached that level (read the paper). there were no gas tanks near where the planes hit. 47 core columns disintegrated. i'm not saying one way or the other, but he's saying it's worth investigating this as the FEMA, NIST, 9-11 commission reports did not address vital parts. read the paper yourself before you judge it. he cites all of his info.
response to scarlett's additional details: taken from the response against Popular Mechanics:
An interesting message was sent by Kevin Ryan (site manager of the Environmental Health Laboratories, owned by Underwriters Laboratories, the company who certified the steel used in the Twin Towers) to NIST regarding the temperature reached by the burning jet fuel, stating that
The results of your recently published metallurgical tests seem to clear things up ... Your comments suggest that the steel was probably exposed to temperatures of only about 500F (250C), which is what one might expect from a thermodynamic analysis of the situation.
However the summary of the new NIST report seems to ignore your findings, as it suggests that these low temperatures caused exposed bits of the building's steel core to "soften and buckle." Additionally this summary states that the perimeter columns softened, yet your findings make clear that "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperature above 250C." ... If steel from those buildings did soften or melt, I'm sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers.
http://serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm#6
2006-09-10 10:13:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Oly 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
The reason Osama hasn't been caught is because all of our troops are in Iraq.
If we had 100,000+ troops searching for him in Afghanistan, we'd sure have a better chance.
Bush and "his" policies are simply failures and has made us less safe.
2006-09-10 10:22:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by p2prox 4
·
1⤊
2⤋