since I find that most people believe the media networks are mouthpieces for political parties ?

Question

how can anyone believe what the media reports on any topic that has political weight ?how can we know what the media was reporting in the weeks following 9-11 are the true reports of what really happened and why is the media not responding to the questons raised by additional video and other reports of secondary explotions at the world trade center sites are the firefighters who were there and said they heard what sounded like a controlled demolition type detonation before the south tower had collapsed lieing and if they are lieing why are they not being exposed for liars ? what makes sense is that if there is any video that will support what was realeased as the official story we would be seeing it in its entierty not just 5 frames at a time that are still showing nothing .im not a conspiracy nut or believe in anything that is realated to c. t . I ask these questions because there should be plenty of unedited video and unedited statements avalible im asking were are they?why so secrtv

Answer 1

And high cancer rates. And the BBC movie "Dirty Bomb". Perhaps the allies are still telling us stuff our government won't.

Answer 2

The mainstream media are far more accountable than the 'independent' sites that can post any deception they wish.

If you watch Discovery Channel lately, you will see many programs showing detailed footage explaining and detailing what happened. 'Anatomy of a Collapse' was most compelling. In it, the building designer explained why the towers collapsed. He understood the mechanism and took the blame for not making the buildings more capable of withstanding an aircraft strike.

He also provided a physical demonstration using a model of the building's floor support structure.

It all came down to fireproof insulation being stripped off the steel supports under the floors. They couldn't handle the heat.

Regarding Building 7: Conspiracy sites show you the BACK side of the building that was not damaged. If you see the front side, the building was smashed. About 25% of its first 25 floors were just gouged out. Then it burned for 7 hours before falling. It's amazing the building stood as long as it did.

One of the 'Conspiracy' sites did have an angle of the building that showed some of the damage. I mentioned to its webmaster that the images contradicted his textual claims that it was not damaged. He responded by removing that video clip rather than by setting the record straight.

Answer 3

The Media is the mouthpeice of those who own it. Often those corporatist businessmen share the same opinion as the Government that they heavily fund to run business as usual for them. They do go off the rails on things like so-called illegal immigration, which corporations love for the cheap labor, government has also to tame the people... see the dillema.
The agree on most points though.

as far as 9-11, people saw with their own eyes the towers being hit with planes. end of story.

the conspiracy theorists really do a dis-service to the serious inquiry about Saudi ties and the wishes of the families of 9-11 victims by bringing to the fore a perfect excuse for this issue not being dealt with. Coulding the facts with conspiracy theories is how the Governement has always dealt with political assasinations - MLK, John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy etc. and is how they are dealing with the ties to the Saudis on 9-11 and the justification for Iraq.
If you want to help them in that project go ahead. Most people are not interested though, I think, because they knwo what I am talking about and agree.

Answer 4

Read from several source. The NY Times, the Wall Street Journal especially. Look at foreign newspapers (The Guardian etc.)

Answer 5

read this. this is what the professor from brigham young university was suspended for. read it yourself and judge its legitimacy. this offers what the right hates the most: true intelligence.

Answer 6

oh my God...another conspiracy theorist nutcase!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!