field sobriety test or completely destroyed it. and georges cocaine habit with booze all mixed in....the iraq war is starting to make sense
2006-09-10 09:08:27 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Speaking of booze & drugs, maybe you should lay off of em, before coming on here and making an idiot out of yourself, with your dumb words! Ancient History...... not to mention, Propaganda..
2006-09-10 09:11:01 · answer #1 · answered by Katz 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
These answerers would be funny if they weren't so scary. I can't believe people like that exist in this country. This clearly isn't old news since most people have never heard of it. and secondly, various answers mark you as a 'pro-illegal' and say that you are trying to use this to explain Iraq. Really? What? Do these people even read the (clearly not a) question. It is also funny that the knee jerk reaction from conservatives ifor all of their wrongdoings is to point at one Democrat who did something once. The Difference between Kennedy and this is that Kennedy drove off a bridge killing his passenger. Ms. Bush drove headlong into another car that happened to be carrying her boyfriend. Aside from the fact that for many people saying "Bush" makes them orgasm and saying "Kennedy" makes them throw things, which of the situations above sounds more suspicious?
2016-03-27 05:42:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To Marceldev: The fact that Bush is doing nothing in Somalia or Sudan, let alone what he is doing in Iraq and the fact that he doesn't consider Osama a priority makes it quite difficult to critisize Clinton in defending him. Not saying what Clinton did was excusable, but wouldn't it make sense to hold BOTH responsible, rather than tapping Clinton on the hand and letting Bush off the hook, for the same thing?
2006-09-10 09:20:17 · answer #3 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
So the first lady got into a traffic accident and the President did drugs. We know, we know. But lets focus on the present, there is enough to deal with without bringing up past insignificance's.
2006-09-10 09:37:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You got this Laura thing all mixed up.
All she did was murder her X boyfriend in a jealous rage. There was no center line, drunk issue at all. Simply an upset teenage girl.
Unless she killed someone else that I don't know about???
Go big Red Go
2006-09-10 09:16:20 · answer #5 · answered by 43 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hadn't heard that one before!
2006-09-10 09:24:15 · answer #6 · answered by Putt 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nah, she was just pissed from a drug deal gone bad.
2006-09-10 09:14:14 · answer #7 · answered by Thomas S 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Let's see. No proof provided. Nothing you can back up so you resort to making up stories. This illustrates why people should ingore your assertions.
2006-09-10 09:11:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
another idiot liberal with nothing better to do then make an *** of himself on yahoo answers.
GEEZ man get a life will ya???
2006-09-10 09:25:56 · answer #9 · answered by maddog 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, she hadn't had anything to drink and didn't do drugs.
2006-09-10 09:13:36 · answer #10 · answered by Melissa 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋