Dems: Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Russ Feingold, Tom Daschle.
Repubs: John McCain, Colin Powell.
Indies: Jesse Ventura, my cat, the guy who changes the water cooler jugs on Thursdays.
2006-09-06 04:47:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Condi Rice
She is one of the most highly educated persons in America.
She came from an impoverished family and rose to the #3 position in the country.
God saved her as a little girl from the Selma Alabama Church bombing where her class mates died.
She is Secretary of State so she has the experience of dealing with the rest of the crazy world.
She is not a politician, counting electoral votes, and courting the media like Hillary.
2006-09-11 09:16:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gone Rogue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since we are all humans and it is human nature to make mistakes noone would be ideal. The person that would be closest to ideal though is Condoleeza Rice. I challenge you to find a smarter woman in this country. I believe she is more than qualified and think she may even prove to be the best president this country has ever had. Just my opinion though, that is what you wanted isn't it?
2006-09-05 22:08:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wilkow Conservative 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably Hillary.. why? Because we need National Health Care in this country in a BIG way!! Next how many times have you 'heard' the First Lady runs the White House? 3rd, While I have not reviewed all of her records and/or positions........ it just makes good dam sense to me that we put MR Clinton back in the White House so that he can 'role-reverse' with Mrs. Clinton :) That way we'd get 8 out of Bill, 8 out of Hillary and p!ss the Bushes off cuz they weren't smart enough to think of that first - THAT is justice LOL :) At least in my own mind ;)
** Edit to the poster below: I make international calls, and I am a disabled nearly shut-in - then a housewife, now divorced. I'm not speaking to anyone illegally, however, the thought of the government listening to 'such a non-threat' in this case turns my stomach. Thankfully my phone company wouldn't turn or the dam records as they had NO RIGHT to ask for them. End of Story. We are being infringed upon, and while I will give up SOME of my liberties as an American, for a safer country, I am not wiling to feel as intruded upon by what I hear AND read.
Go ahead and laugh dear, you are entitled to yours as I am entitled to mine ..... It's the American Way! ;)
2006-09-05 21:35:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by replies2news 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Colin Powell with Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona as his running mate.
It's time.
Psst... replies2news... why are you so worried about the information gathered about who is talking to whom across the phone lines? Have you been calling Al-Queda again?!? If you are doing nothing wrong, what are you afraid they'll find? Oh, and by the way, Clinton's impeachment had nothing to do with the word sex. He lied under oath, plain and simple. Valerie Plame?? *LOL* You may not want to go there.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/02/washington/02leak.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460.html
This is only the beginning of the truth coming out. It is going to get much more interesting.
2006-09-05 21:37:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
In order to represent the humans of the planet, there should be a male and female leader. Both sexes should be represented. Get rid of the 2 party system, its nothing short of a bad marriage anyway, with the bickering, name calling and he-said-she-said. Co-Prez is the way to go!
2006-09-05 22:10:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by roseypicture 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bill Clinton. Let's vote for unlimited term limits when his is re-elected!! Have you ever noticed how all of the former Presidents that do anything humanitarian are always Democrats!
2006-09-05 22:09:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by edaem 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
George Allen, Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani.
2006-09-05 21:34:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by slyry75 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ronald Reagen
2006-09-05 22:11:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by wunderkind 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree as a rule with "thedude," stable reaction. through fact you're in seek of actually a complete assessment of Ron Paul's platform/history, I appeared up his entire checklist. The link i'm attaching might desire to convey you to the main complete assessment with regard to government i understand of, this seems to be like what you're finding for, verify it out. you could study each and every vote on each and every thing he has made, what number absences,etc- each and every thing! wish it satisfies your interest. Ron Paul is the guy (in my opinion).
2016-11-25 00:03:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋