English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-04 11:15:21 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I want you guys to comment on my blog.

2006-09-04 11:27:30 · update #1

14 answers

Looking at the amount of damage they've done, I would vote for Bush.

2006-09-04 11:22:59 · answer #1 · answered by Rustic 4 · 1 1

Your question is like asking which is worse a Lincoln Town Car or a green apple. These two characters are different in every way.

Bush is the President of a large country that champions freedom and democracy and is currently involved in trying to help a people who are their own enemies.

bin Laden is a Nodus in the world's attempt at peace and prosperity; a mugwump of terror. He has a small following of murderers and his group have helped no one.

Bush may have made errors but the errors were part of trying to solve tricky problems, many of which were the result of Constitutional limitations imposed on him.

bin Laden, who is a totally free agent uses every rotten trick in the book and has made errors only in respect to the numbers he wants killed.

They cannot be compared.

2006-09-04 19:02:05 · answer #2 · answered by Mr.Been there 3 · 1 0

Buddy, I'd advise you to stay safely in front of your computer while you mentally masturbate on your blog, and not venture into the real world. People have been know to have their throats cut ear-to-ear out here when they did not know the difference between Bush and Bin Laden: As you obviously don't.

2006-09-04 18:43:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Ah Ha, let me remind you that the Israelis would like to destroy the Palestinians.

Bin Laden is an extremist that shouldn't represent Islam, and Bush is an ineffective leader who has lost the support of his nation.

Yes, they're similar, at least.

2006-09-04 18:23:23 · answer #4 · answered by Link 5 · 2 0

I think that they work hand-in-hand with one another. Look how bin Laden tapes come out just when Bush can benefit from them. Plus, we quit looking for him and went straight to Iraq? What's up with that?

2006-09-04 18:20:46 · answer #5 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 2 0

I think Bush and bin Laden may be buddies, why else hasn't this President located and killed the terrorist who was responsible for killing so many Americans?

2006-09-04 18:18:06 · answer #6 · answered by CharlieB 2 · 3 1

They're 2 of the same kind.

Tommy D and Ouzian make good points.

2006-09-04 18:22:46 · answer #7 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 2 0

we gave bin laden money and arms to defeat the soviets when they invaded Iran so i figure the u.s. is still his ally.

2006-09-04 18:25:03 · answer #8 · answered by marcus g 2 · 1 0

Only a sick Liberal would come up with something like this.

Im sure someone will report you for spamming/advertising as well

2006-09-04 19:09:36 · answer #9 · answered by itsallover 5 · 0 1

Lets find out.
Did bush kill thousands of innocent people? No
Did Bush own terrorists groups? No
Did Bush order the destruction of Israel? No
Did Bush want all Christians dead? No

2006-09-04 18:18:43 · answer #10 · answered by Ah Ha 4 · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers