Obama, Dean, Warner.
Or somebody else.
Let's get the speculation going!
2006-09-03 14:49:55 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm a fan of Obama. I think he'd be a good VP candidate, but he's such a superb speaker, so bright, and posesses such fantastic ideas that I think he'd outshine the top of the ticket.
I think it may be early for him, but I'm fine with that.
2006-09-03 16:02:00 · answer #1 · answered by Steve 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm not a Democrat but I think realistically John Edwards has the best shot. He's well liked, he's a Moderate, his record is unblemished and he held up well against Cheney in the debates.
This country is not ready to elect a woman president and certainly not Hillary Clinton. Likewise, we'll not be electing a black man as president anytime soon.
As to Gore he simply doesn't have any personality.
Warner or Edwards have the best shot. A party ticket of those two would probably ensure a win.
2006-09-03 14:57:29 · answer #2 · answered by Doc Watson 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
None of them will win, we need higher quality well rounded candidates with a presidential quality intellect(being president of the united states is most likely the most intellectually daunting and demanding task in the world), very good domestic policies, do to the shrinking of the world politically, a firm highly skilled approach to foreign relations are critically importent, we need to make allies not more enemies, we need someone with the ability to work with the U.N. and international community multi-laterally,.we need someone with a confidence building look, a hopeful feel, charisma, and the ability to see if a policy position or tactic or strategy isn't working and the ability to find a better replacement. Not that I'm sayying each possible canidate doesn't each have some of these qualities in the level required but just not all of them at once.
2006-09-03 15:14:56 · answer #3 · answered by Stan S 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would think that Gore is the best choice. He's brilliant and experienced, he actually won against Bush, and he actually did invent the Internet for all intents and purposes despite the bashing he's received.
However, he probably wouldn't win if he ran. I would say that Obama has the best chance of winning Democratic primaries.
2006-09-05 15:38:10 · answer #4 · answered by Paul J 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mayor Rocky Anderson
2006-09-03 14:52:09 · answer #5 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Lieberman, because he's a moderate and not as polarizing as the liberal choices you gave us. It's so sad how the liberals have split the Democrats in half by attacking Lieberman. He will win the Senate race in CT as an Independent. Lieberman has actually been to Iraq to see what's going on.
2006-09-03 15:07:28 · answer #6 · answered by MorgantonNC 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Barack Obama or mayb Joe Biden? I wish the Dems would get someone strong to run.
As James Carville said, if they can't win now, they need to scrap the whole party. I think both parties need to be overhauled completely.
I used to be a republican, but they lost me quite a while ago.
2006-09-03 14:57:34 · answer #7 · answered by Lori 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hillary,Gore,Kerry,Edwards,Feingoldand Dean will not get elected. We need someone new and someone not perceieved as being too liberal.
2006-09-03 14:56:08 · answer #8 · answered by 123 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't experience she'll be too historic, notwithstanding i trust she ought to easily right serve for one time period if she ran and replaced into elected in 2016. She'll be sixty 9, no longer 70, so serving from sixty 9-seventy 3 once you haven't had any life-threatening diseases like cancer is exquisite.
2016-12-06 08:22:04 · answer #9 · answered by triola 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The best ones would have to be either Hillary or Kerry
We need someone that cares. As we know Bush sure
does not care at all.
2006-09-03 15:37:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋