Larry Silverstein confirms that the building was demolished with explosives. Do you realise that he would not have gotten a cent for insurance for WTC 7 if the cause would have been demolition.
2006-09-03 13:03:31 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I have seen and heard Larry Silverstein say that the building was 'pulled'. It is so dumbfoundingly remarkable, that despite this admission by someone who should know, the hill billy racists here still tell you that terrorists attacked building7 as well as WTC buildings.
2006-09-03 13:18:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes Silverstein did say this, they had to do it because it was so called "Badly damaged by fire" and had to be "Pulled" which in demolition terms means "blown up". How long do you think it takes to wire explosives to demolish a building the size of WTC 7. A lot longer than a few hours I know. Probably 10-14 days. Just a thought.
2006-09-05 01:38:24 · answer #2 · answered by researcher 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The truth will not be known, we can only surmise as we are not in possession of all the facts and never will be.
Of course there are theories, which most of you will call `conspiracy theories` purely because we need to know the truth and are never told it. It is in our nature to seek the truth, truth is the only reality after all. If we cannot believe the words given to us by our politicians and media we will form our own opinions. Please do not think of those that seek information from outside of the official cartel of knowledge as foolish or idiotic, they are merely seeking to find what they believe is hidden.
For those of you who believe everything you are told, without thought and without consideration, great, I hope you are comfortable, it is much easier to read the papers, see the tv news and believe what you are told by that nice newsman or elected official than to face the fact that they may all be wrong, or, worse still, lying to you.
As I said, nothing wrong in searching for the truth, but blindly accepting what is served before you is hardly freedom of choice is it ?
2006-09-06 22:49:22 · answer #3 · answered by Robert Abuse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd Honestly like you to STOP for one second and seriously think about what would be involved in a cover up that BIG. First how many people would have to have been BLIND NOT to notice enough explosives being brought into those buildings to actually bring them down. Second how do you propose they got good old Osama to join right in with there plan and claim responsibility. Think about it if JUST one person came forward out of all those who would have had to been involved. Do you HONESTLY believe they could hide a story that HUGH from ALL Media. Please don't tell me ALL media is controlled by our government. What about foreign media. NOBODY on this earth would pass at a story that HUGH NOBODY. Your biting on angles put out by people with FAR to much time on there hands. I'm sure 50 years from now people will still be talking of this so called conspiracy just like they talk about the Roswell UFO crash, Kennedy's assassination. Believe what you want but if you add SERIOUS thought to it there is NO WAY on this earth what your saying could have happened. Just ask Big tobacco. It only took ONE whistle blower to bring down the Entire industry.
2006-09-03 13:17:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
There is a difference between destruction and demolition. If a buildig is gutted, it is detroyed...yet it might still be standing. Demolition is the formal to-the-ground destruction of a building.
2006-09-03 13:06:41 · answer #5 · answered by Brand X 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I've seen him explain that when he said "We pulled the building" he meant "we got the fire-fighters and paramedics pulled out of the building", and he just can't believe, and neither can I, that people think the building was blown up, when clearly, a plane was flown into it!
How dumb do you have to be to think otherwise?
Do you think one tower fell, and the other would have stood?
2006-09-03 13:24:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You seem to want to believe this conspiracy nonsense. I suppose it makes a better story in the pub.
2006-09-06 07:55:44 · answer #7 · answered by Veritas 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 9/11 commission was wrong!!!!
2006-09-03 13:07:59 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And which branch of Al Quaida do you work for.
2006-09-07 12:02:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
More conspiracy theories!
Believe in such theories shows your (lack of) intelligence.........
2006-09-04 06:29:50 · answer #10 · answered by hungryhart 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋