2006-09-02 11:54:41 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, He wouldn't do anything to solve our immigration problems. While, he does believe in getting the national debt under control, his methods don't focus on cutting federal expenditures.
2006-09-02 11:59:53 · answer #1 · answered by Edward 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No.
John McCain has lost his credibility and seems to be about 10 years behind the political curve.
I used to think that McCain would have been a good choice over both Bush and Gore. He seemed to be more concerned with economic internal policy and about not playing into the hands of political extremists, left or right. Had he won the nomination over W, I would have voted GOP for the first time in a national election.
Six years later and McCain has backed off his tough stances and rolled over and played dead for the right wing of the GOP (but who has not I guess) party. Not only does he play to the hands of his former intra-party enemies, he embraces them with a Judas Kiss.
I think he makes a good senator, and is a refreshing alternative to the Santorum/Frist/Talent Theo-cons who run the party. But He thirts for power a bit too much and makes too many concessions to extremists.
2006-09-02 13:54:29 · answer #2 · answered by DrSean 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
miraculous question, rather. Mitt Romney, of direction, is a member of what's fairly a damaging extremely-precise and fanciful non secular cult, and could have ultimately been rejected with the help of maximum individuals. And particular, i understand all approximately LDS/Mormon realities, coverage and politics, and that i will stick with the help of that fact, as I did as quickly as I lived in a hotbed of their activity in Deseret (their call for Arizona). And he's in keeping with risk even farther into the wicked, degenerate end of the lunatic precise than many of the jerks who ran McCain's campaign. however the Republican party has bought its bought to the kryptofascists, and there at the instant are no youthful adult males with any techniques exterior the severe reactionary end of the party whom they seem to have the potential to tolerate. One has to ask your self: Who have they have been given decrease than sixty 5, with some potential, and the opportunity of even ONE thought the full u . s . a . isn't thoroughly bored with? i won't be able to think of of everybody.
2016-11-23 19:48:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he shouldn't run for President. When he had his chance, against George Bush Jr., he gave in and let Bush Jr. take over. That is a decision that will always be on voters minds and be negative against John McCain. Americans don't want a President who can't stand up and face the competition, by giving in!
2006-09-02 12:14:54 · answer #4 · answered by manyolito 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes I do, I am a staunch Democrat and a member of the Students for a Democratic Society, and I still support him.
2006-09-02 12:07:31 · answer #5 · answered by John Tice 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he should run he is more Middle of the Road politically speaking and would appeal to more people. he would be a step in the right direction for the Republicans.
2006-09-02 11:59:29 · answer #6 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think so, and I'm a Democrat, I think he is an honorable man, and would represent both parties as President.
2006-09-02 12:59:59 · answer #7 · answered by Annie Red Head 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe he should run for president. He is an outstanding individual. he served this country proudly in the military and we need someone like him as our leader.
2006-09-02 12:01:52 · answer #8 · answered by margeritaperez 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Although I'm not American and my ideas are more on the Liberal side, I have tons of respect for the man.
2006-09-02 11:56:38 · answer #9 · answered by kelitahmadi 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We already tried that, but anyone beats Hitlery Clinton!!!!
2006-09-02 11:58:51 · answer #10 · answered by sparkylump 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋