first...the lib-tards will not take over either house in November...it is more likely they will lose seats...due to their feckless actions.
2006-09-02 08:08:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by bushfan88 5
·
2⤊
7⤋
in the event that they like to waste time rather of tackling the numerous issues which face this u . s . a . they might desire to decide for it yet not something will come of it. you may desire to comprehend Bush has acted to preserve this u . s . a . and because there have been not own effective properties what's going to they get on him. The mess in Iraq became voted on with the help of the two Democrats and republicans. The intelligence presented became given with the help of democratic appointees to the CIA and British intelligence. human beings such as you're why this u . s . a . is falling at the back of rather of going forward. The time spent attempting to question might want for use to discover a fashion of expanding our national protection and offering extra for the greenbacks than is at present being performed.
2016-11-23 19:28:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be outstanding.Then we could tie Bushs hands on everything the way the Republicans did to Bush his second term.Oh I dream of the day Bush has to deal with a Democrat controlled House and Senate. I voted for Lamont because Lieberman was no longer voting in the manner that the people of Connecticut wanted him to vote.This is a blue state and we dont support this war or Bush.For Lieberman to be so arrogant that he thought he was above the wishes of the people who voted him in power was his mistake.He learned and hopefully the rest of the Democrats will learn that no matter how long you have been in office, you vote how the people want you to vote, not how you want to vote, because our taxes pay you and we vote you into office, so you work for us.If you have been a senator for twenty years it doesnt matter, we will turn on you and get someone new who will vote how we want and thats the way it should be.
2006-09-02 08:07:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Being a Californian I am ashamed that we are represented by someone as worthless and incompent as Nancy Pelosi. She is just another politician that has become self-important, and doesn't give a damn about her constituency.
2006-09-02 09:18:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by stan l 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lieberman, a Dumbya enabler, is not a Democrat, since he would have accepted the choice of his party if he was. In CT I proudly cast my vote for Ned.
2006-09-02 08:22:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Ummmmm Pelosi as commander in chief?
And democrats didn't abandon Lieberman, Lieberman abandoned the democrats...
2006-09-02 08:08:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dastardly 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
Once and for all, what happened in Connecticut was just democracy pure and simple. You repuglicans don't have a clue what democracy is. When your Representative no longer represents your best interest and serves his or her own it is time to have new representation. That is what happened and that is the way it should be.
2006-09-02 08:17:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
it is to bad you can only run twice. If you could run as many times as you want clinton would still be getting bj in his office
2006-09-02 08:09:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
YES to all three of these questions. IMPEACH PELOSI< CLINTON< REID< KENNEDY
and anyone that I have forgotten!!!!
2006-09-02 08:10:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
i think the democracts are the best choices for this election also i think the republicans stink all they are for the rich!!!!!! if both houses are run by democracts i couldnt be happier!!!!!
2006-09-02 08:07:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by richardstz19 3
·
4⤊
3⤋
Dems dont have a chance in hell winning in NOV.
2006-09-02 08:05:27
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋