this reminds me how we gave Saddam chemical weapons and intelligence and tanks and mines etc because he was a friend
2006-09-02 06:53:37 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"I don't believe in making policy by blog."
So now we shouldn't think about things our government does?
I thought freedom of speech and freedom to assemble were protected so that the people of this country could celebrate their ideas and share them in a civilized manor. He's asking for our opinions on this matter and your opinion on blogging has little to do with this.
My opinion: I don't like it. We did the same thing with Israel and countless other countries. Why? Why do we hate it that other countries are developing nuclear technology but then we give it out like crazy.
2006-09-02 07:00:48 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
From the beginning of Nuclear Arms (post WW2) no two countries that posses the weapons have ever fought. The theory of Mutually Assured Destruction has of today worked in a perverse way. India's current immediate enemy is Pakistan. It is believed Pakistan is capable of producing and delivering a Nuclear Missile. If the theory holds these two countries will cease hostilities when both acknowledge the ability to produce and deliver these weapons. I assume you meant weapon technology not nuclear technology for electrical power generation.
2006-09-02 07:07:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
India has had Nuclear power plants and Nuclear warheads for many years (as have Neighboring Pakistan). The Nuclear Genie is out of the bag in that part of the world.
We need to concentrate on Keeping it out of Others Hands (like Iran and Syria). Not keeping safety Upgrades out of those who already have Nuclear Power.
2006-09-02 07:13:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anthony P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
India has had nukes since Clinton was President. Now the government wants to help India build nuclear power plants to provide power without covering the planet in a cloud of green house gasses. Isn't that what liberals have been crying for for 6 years, reducing green house gasses?
If US companies don't do it French and German companies will, maybe even Russian, remember Chernobyl? What's wrong with helping the environment AND helping a few US companies win multi-billion dollar contracts?
2006-09-02 06:58:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
It allows the US companies like GE and Westinghouse to sell commercial nuclear fuel and technologies to India. The seperation of the Indian military and commercial nuclear groups was a requirement for this to happen.
2006-09-02 06:58:00 · answer #5 · answered by jpxc99 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush and Congress just chose sides in the decades old war between Pakistan and India.
2006-09-02 06:55:00 · answer #6 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Did your mother constantly feed you big bowls of Stupid-O's when you were younger? We DID NOT give So-Damn-Insane any CBR weapons. He developed them on his own! Tanks, yes, firearms yes, artillery yes...The mines were a hold over from the days when he was in bed with the Soviet Union.
I'd wager to say that the ghost of Dr. Goebbels cackles every time you open your mouth.
2006-09-02 07:01:37 · answer #7 · answered by Albannach 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well we all know Bush is an idiot. But then again hes probily selling them technology, to plan for a future war, like always. Aren't most wars planned, well anyway thats my opinion.
2006-09-02 06:55:38 · answer #8 · answered by Star 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sure, sell them weapons just in case years from now we need to occupy their land also. Then our claim that they have WMD's will be easily established. Corrupt government a**holes.
2006-09-02 07:14:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
procuring and merchandising 2nd hand (i.e., used books) is rather lots criminal in India. Your chum can get into the project of procuring for and merchandising used books, with none hesitation. With each and all the terrific.
2016-12-18 03:40:40 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋