English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

since he says he knows what's best for the Iraqi people, why can't the US exile him there to be the King of Iraq,, we could save his legacy,, fulfill his destiny,,, the American people would be heros of the world, right?

2006-09-02 06:20:44 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

Finally, a plan that is win-win. :)

2006-09-02 06:25:06 · answer #1 · answered by Holly 3 · 2 4

Neddie, George Bush is already the King of Iraq.
Just sending him over there wouldn't do any good.
They would probably just want to throw him in the cell with Saddam Hussein. Silly girl.

2006-09-03 12:44:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Personally, I think we should send Al Gore and John Kerry. Al Gore can talk the insurgents to death, and John Kerry can find a rich widow, move into one of Sadams old palaces and live like the king he has always wanted to be. You could send Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to take care of the Camel droppings, they both need something constructive to do. Wish I could think of something for both Clintons to do, but they are utterly worthless!!!!

2006-09-02 13:37:55 · answer #3 · answered by rosi l 5 · 3 1

I would, but then I would feel extreme guilt due to what we would have inflicted on the people of Iraq. Bush needs to be placed in confinement with padded walls somewhere where he cannot hurt anyone else. Send Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and Powell while you are at it. Now that I would vote for, as long as Jeb is not doing the counting.

2006-09-02 13:42:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

american people are already heros of the world . this would be a great idea due to his great leading abilities , but even though they appreciate all the work he has done for them they would still probably want one of their own

2006-09-02 13:26:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

I think not. Since you seem to know everything, how about you be the Queen of Iraq??

2006-09-03 15:21:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

ohhh criticize others for stupid questions and you top them all What a hypocrite!!!!!! Besides can't vote the President to do that!!! although the democrats DID vote to invade iraq, so that allows them to go to RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????

2006-09-02 13:26:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Sorry, I wouldn't inflict George W. on the Iraq people,they don't deserve that much horror after all that they have bean through.

2006-09-02 13:24:20 · answer #8 · answered by blondecarpenter@sbcglobal.net 2 · 1 4

Clinton is the one worried about his legacy!

2006-09-02 13:23:24 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 3 1

go f uck yourself liberal, what you going to say about Joe Wilson? I don't hear an apology coming from you whore. Ask Joe Wilson the pimp mister what he is going to explain to you about all his lies?

2006-09-02 16:00:38 · answer #10 · answered by AmericanBorn 1 · 1 1

Great idea! He can take his people toys
with him...Jeffy Gannon and Condi...
what a great 3 some they would make in Iraq, eh!

2006-09-02 13:23:55 · answer #11 · answered by repugs-suk 1 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers