How perverse? Good question!
The Far Left Wing ACLU Adoring Liberal Democrats NOW turn on and cannibalistically consume raw, one of their own " Sen. Lieberman" no less, that's about as sick as one can get!
The Far Left Wing ACLU Adoring Liberal Democrats dominate the majority of University faculties (those that can't do-teach) and the Kosher Valley (Hollywood) crowd fill their ranks.
BUT there is the great Heartland of America that is fed up with the perversity and Anti-American Bash Bush, Bash/Blame America rants and their policy re: the War on Terror which is to be Politically Correct and "Hug A Misunderstood Muslim Homocide Bomber".
They strive to erode traditional values like Christmas no less, a legitimate Federally recognized holiday by Congress and now to place a Lesbian in the Highest office of the land is just the tip of Iceberg!
How diseased? The patient is terminal.
Source(s):
The Far Left Wing Liberal Deomcrats: A Lost Cause
Chas. Abernat
2006-09-02 03:56:42 · 10 answers · asked by B'klyn Barracuda 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Its the socilist faction of the democratic party that will prevent both houses of congress form being a democratic sweep.
No matter how dissatisfied with Bush people are, the DNCs socialist redistribution of wealth agenda won't fly on Main street USA.
Hillary Clinton may raise huge quantities of money for the DNC but her politics frighten moderate Americans.
2006-09-02 04:08:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Political tolerance and majority rule while minority rights are observed.... these are the landmarks that make America one of the greatest democracies in the world. Would you want it any other way? The duality of Liberty US style is that while you can protest as loudly as you want, (and history may very well prove you right), you still have to wait for your turn if you happen to be on the short end of the election results this time. For the record, I like Lieberman a lot.
2006-09-02 04:36:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in no way. Moderates and liberals are appalled on the seizure of the AP telephone information. they are very upset that Obama did no longer shop his promise approximately shutting Guantanamo. they are upset on the IRS' habit. (even with the undeniable fact that they do experience a good case could be made that the 501(c)(4)s have been abusing that type. Karl Rove wasn't installation a "social provider" non-income! greater than a number of liberals and moderates are worried appropriate to the drone application and, definite, the concentrated on of people. yet the place the message gets muddled is with the greater extreme misstatements approximately, working example, Benghazi. definite, that's sparkling that the two the State branch and the CIA tousled royally. however the memos element to those companies desperately attempting to cover their rear ends--in no way worrying no count if Obama have been given re-elected. concentration on the genuine issues: Bureaucrats conserving their turf. The State branch over and over turning down requests for further risk-free practices. there is greater than a number of valid pork there. desire that facilitates.
2016-09-30 06:44:16 · answer #3 · answered by schnetter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Lieberman had it coming for the reason of not standing for anything that his party agrees with.
2. I have never experienced any sort of bias in my college experience.
3. Ahuge majority of the population know that Bush is a failure. Even life-long conservatives continually question him. i.e. William Buckley and George Will
4. You seem to bunch all liberals into the same category. Every liberal I know goes to church, gives to charity, and celebrates Christmas.
2006-09-02 04:04:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am from Connecticut and I happily voted for Lamont, even though this may mean splitting the vote, because it is high time that we hold our politicians responsible.They work for us ok? We vote them in our taxes pay their salary.I have heard nothing but whining about it was stupid because we will lose a senior senator and Lamont will have no real power. What the hell kind of talk is this? The people who voted for Lamont should applauded for doing something about the problems we face today. We should be applauded for holding Lieberman responsible for not voting the way we wanted him too, because he works for us not the other way around.
2006-09-02 04:00:35 · answer #5 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Frist has added liberalism to the list of treatable diseases and has proposed and it may have already passed, a bill that allows for liberals to be reimbursed for psychiatric treatments.
If they got help and learned to know, understand and believe in the truth/facts, I would be more than willing to accept them as, well at least human.
2006-09-02 04:16:02 · answer #6 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
There's no such thing as "liberal reasoning". The words contradict each other. When reasoning is used, liberalism is negated.
2006-09-02 05:03:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the lying left has no ability to "reason"
2006-09-02 11:19:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah. Its way out there!
2006-09-02 04:00:26 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Great rant but what exactly is your question?
2006-09-02 04:06:50 · answer #10 · answered by Bad M 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋