English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've heard that Libs are cowards because they want a resolution to pull out of Iraq, so anyone who would agree with a resolution to pull out of Iraq is a coward? I'm not seeing the connection here.

2006-08-29 07:54:54 · 6 answers · asked by Fiesty Redhead 2 in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

You're not seeing the connection because there is none.

1-Bush launched a pre-emptive strike on a nation unrelated to 9-11.

2-He has sinced ADMITTED it was on false intelligence.

3-Rather than withdrawing,we are to "stay the course",which of course,means he doesnt know what to do.

4-Bush has not stated any changes to the course we're staying on.

5-Out of ideas,and with 2600+ American troops dead,about 110 Iraqi civilians dying a day,and expenses of about $213Million a week,the Republicans call any dissenters "cowards" to take the attention of the fact THAT BUSH HAS NO PLAN.

6-That,as our resources are draining away,is the real shame.The fact is,the Republicans seem to be willing to support any Republican.They have no ideas so they'll say the Democrats have "no ideas",because in fact the truth is the other way around

And that's why Democrats will make some gains in the House of Congress and the Senate in November 2006.

candidate

2006-08-29 08:47:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

A person is a coward if they are afraid to stand up for what they believe.

Pulling out of Iraq is not cowardly at all. There is nothing to fight for really. As soon as we leave, they will just destroy the place again.

Our country has other pressing issues to address like our own suffering people, whom we ignore, and our own economy. Rebuilding any country should not be on our agenda.

There is no connection with the political side of it; it's just a bunch of cowards pointing fingers at one another.

2006-08-29 15:02:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Someone who knows where the line is drawn in THEIR life and then won't fight to protect their side of the line.
Anybody that blindly follows the demands of ANY Government official is an idiot up front.
We should know where the line is in Iraq and make the decision accordingly. If the Government and or military doesn't know where the line is then we should get out before we bleed more of our kids who are doing what they see is right.
Conservatives get us into the wrong wars, Liberals will not fight the wars that are needed.

2006-08-29 15:10:57 · answer #3 · answered by neil r 3 · 1 1

I would guess that from the people on this site a coward is someone that doesn't want to nuke the entire Middle East and wants to end the war because they approved of the war in the beginning because of incorrect intelligence and now, after the truth has emerged, no longer supports King George's war.

2006-08-29 15:03:20 · answer #4 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 3 1

It's called logic. Republicans have none. I'm still waiting for them to show me how $150 is less than $27.

(My mom is disabled and on medicare, her out of pocket drug costs before the bill was passed was $27 a month. Now, it's $150 a month. How did the bill REDUCE the cost?)

2006-08-29 15:01:54 · answer #5 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 4 1

No a coward is someone that wanted to go to war at first....Like the Liberals......Then when it is not convenient and messy they want to pull out. That is a coward.

2006-08-29 15:01:19 · answer #6 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers