P ( 1/2 , 2 )
Q ( 2 , 2 )
R ( 2, 1)
Solve for P first, then Q, then R.
for the coordinates for P, x is given as 1/2. Plug x=1/2 into the equation y = 3 / (1+x).
Once you get the y-coordinate for P, you'll notice that Q will have the same y-coordinate.
When you get the coordinates for Q, the x-coordinate will be the same for R.
2006-08-28 13:39:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by q_midori 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
q_midori provided you the best explanation. To add to her comments.
- you are given the first point x=0.5 To find the value in the y=3/(1+x), just substitute for x the value of 0.5. From here you get that y = 2. So, P(x,y) in this case is P=(0.5,2).
- Now you now that the y coordinate of P is 2, so when you project to the point Q, they share the same y value (2). The graph is x=y, so the x value of Q is 2. So, Q(x,y) = (2,2).
- Lastly, with Q now determined, you know that the x coordinate of R is 2. Substituting in y = 3 / (1+x), so will find that the y coordinate of R is 1. Finally, R(x,y) = (2,1).
Go back to the graph and convince yourself that these answers are correct.
Good luck.
2006-08-28 15:08:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by alrivera_1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
x = ?2 ----> vertical asymptote (non-detachable) x = 0 ------> leap discontinuity (non-detachable) x = 2 ------> detachable x = 4 ------> non-detachable observe that there discontinuity at x = 0 is non-detachable even although f(x) is defined at x = 0 ----> f(0) = 4 (as stated in an answer above). A detachable discontinuity has no longer something to do with even if if function is defined at a particular factor, yet has each little thing to do with even if if shrink exists at that factor. considering shrink of f(x) as x procedures 0 from the left = a million/2 and shrink of f(x) as x procedures 0 from the splendid = 4 then shrink of f(x) as x procedures 0 does no longer exist. for this reason discontinuity at x = 0 is non-detachable
2016-11-05 23:54:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
p = .5, 2 q = 2,2 r = 2,1
2006-08-28 13:38:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by peteypab999 1
·
0⤊
0⤋