like a properly brewed cup of tea... well-steeped
2006-08-25 21:22:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by shazam 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ninety-nine point nine percent of all non-fiction books are steeped in fiction. So what is your beef? Are you just a moron? Historically all books about history are written by the winners of any war and all the facts are changed to show the winners as righteous, even if they were worse than those they replaced. So why don't you call that steeped in fiction?
2006-08-26 17:05:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heck. I always thought novels were works of fiction. Even some works of non-fiction are steeped in fiction.
2006-08-26 04:12:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, I like lots of them. And all novels, I guess, are "steeped in fiction" since they are fiction. Novels are fiction by definition.
2006-08-26 04:09:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by silver.graph 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How can a novel NOT be steeped in fiction? If there's no fiction, it isn't a novel.
2006-08-26 23:09:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Frey 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's fiction and then there's fiction. Like for instance, Anne Rice. She's an elegant writer, but she writes fantasy and a little bit of that goes a long way. I liked Interview With The Vampire, but when I read her other works, I wasn't enchanted. Then there's someone like Lawrence Durrell, whose Alexandria Quartet is one of my favorite series of novels, all intertwined. He draws characters so three-dimensional, mysterious, and fascinating, that I never tire of reading him.
2006-08-27 03:13:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chatelaine 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Novels are always fiction.
2006-08-26 04:09:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by sverthfreyr 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's what a novel is....fiction.
2006-08-26 04:11:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by First Lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I did, I wouldn't have written 13 of them! lol
2006-08-26 21:31:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wait for the film actually, better for my eyes.
2006-08-26 04:09:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋