English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do they effect on the image quality or not. Or is the the progressice scan effective in all tvs?

2006-08-21 06:33:22 · 5 answers · asked by Arash 2 in Consumer Electronics Home Theater

5 answers

Progressive scan creates a complete image in one field (1/60 sec in the US) by displaying every line one after the other. The other method, called interlace, takes two fields to complete an image; the first field displays only every other line (the odd-nombered lines, e.g.), and the second field displays the remaining lines. Interlace scanning was used when television was first developed to reduce the required bandwidth needed to transmit the signal. For images that are stationary or slow-moving, your eye retains the image of the first field while the second field is being displayed, so you have the illusion of a complete picture with all the scan lines.

There are two problems with interlacing: 1) fast-moving objects will contain only half the number of lines in any position and will suffer loss of resolution. Edges of moving objects will appear jagged. 2) Cathode ray tube (CRT) displays have difficulty keeping the spacing between the two sets of lines exactly right. This is especially noticeable in text images (even stationary ones) and this is the reason that computer monitors are always progressive scan, and have been from the early days.

New TV sets have gone away from CRTs and use "fixed pixel" displays such as plasma, LCD or DLP. All of these displays are progressive scan; program material that is interlaced is converted to progressive by the electronics in the TV.

2006-08-21 16:21:38 · answer #1 · answered by gp4rts 7 · 0 0

It depends on the size of the TV. If the TV is larger (50-70 inches), then progressive is better, since it contains twice the amount of "picture" so to speak. If the TV is smaller, you probably won't notice the difference, all though there will be an effect. Also, the progressive scan only works on TV's capable of progressive scan. You can tell if the TV will work if the reolution is 480p, 760p or 1080i. Also, the device that is playing the progressive scan content, i.e. DVD, Sattelite/Cable, PS2, ect., has to be connected to the TV (and A/V amplifier, if you are using one) with a component video cable.

2006-08-22 15:38:50 · answer #2 · answered by neal8123 2 · 0 0

Progressive is 1 full video frame every 1/30th of a second.
Interlaced (non-Progressive Scan) is 1/2 of a video frame every 1/60th of a second. Progressive Scan is much clearer in almost all conditions due to the way our eyes see.
http://www.homecinemachoice.com/articles/wvarticles/general/200112_progscan.php
That should help you out a bit!

Hope this gets you going in the right direction!

2006-08-21 08:56:11 · answer #3 · answered by Jawa 3 · 0 0

at the moment I easily were surely in love with Prog. metallic. Bands like Opeth, Outworld, preserve the Hero, discomfort of Salvation, and so on. have basically been blowing me away. i'm form of biased even with the undeniable fact that, because i do not fairly like skill metallic. yet Prog metallic is growing one in all my sought after metallic genres.

2016-11-26 21:31:17 · answer #4 · answered by wansley 4 · 0 0

gp4rts is right on

Progressive is the best, with today's technology they need to dump interlacing altogether.

have no clue what he first guy was talking about and the second was a little short on info.

2006-08-21 17:40:39 · answer #5 · answered by hogie0101 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers