2006-08-18 03:33:59 · 27 answers · asked by gillianandgerardsdad 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Positively yes!!!
2006-08-18 03:39:02 · answer #1 · answered by Professor Chris 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The president made not person-friendly selections. it truly is amazingly revealing to work out those who supported him and reported the same issues on Iraq, have turn-flopped. They now disavow the conflict, and opt to resign the strive against, and make the soldier's sacrifices a waste.
2016-11-26 00:06:45 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a philosophical question... should we stand by and not help a people in need?
How many of those a$$holes that answered yes, have actually stopped and helped a stranger with a broken down vehicle or flat tire?
We don't need to "police" the planet but we should be there to help those who need it. All Americans care about is the price of their fuel these days. Hell, Canadians and Europeans have been paying more for fuel than we are right now... 15 years ago!
2006-08-18 03:42:34 · answer #3 · answered by MadMaxx 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Although I was totally against the war from the get-go, I completely agree that we cannot pull out now in order to prevent civil war in Iraq. We do not want to create another Bin Laden, who after the war in Afghanistan when we pulled so easily out, backlashed against us and created his own militia, which could easily (and is currently) being done in Iraq. I hope this war doesnt go on for ever, but we have to consider all persons and responsiblities obliged from our decision.
2006-08-18 03:41:36 · answer #4 · answered by Stacy R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Short answer, yes.
Long answer - Iraq was a smoke and mirros job to distract from the lack of porgress in the hunt for Bin Laden (whose family is so financially associated with Bush's family interests it's like they were cousins) and Bush's desire to have an easy target to make the US look tough.
He didn't finish the job in Afganistan.
2006-08-18 03:43:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't say "wasting time" and "sacrificing soldiers" but I think someone need to rethink some key points here.
2006-08-18 03:58:36 · answer #6 · answered by ihaftaknow 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it is not. Just remember all the americans that we lost during the terrorists attacks. People seems to have forgotten about them. We are loosing soldiers, yes we are but if we stop right now their deaths are for nothing, that is why I believe that George Bush has to finish the job. And remember support our troops, because the don't want to be there either but they are fighting for OUR freedom, that is why I thank the President GWB for keeping this nation safe.
2006-08-18 03:42:15 · answer #7 · answered by Lilly 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We are in the Second Gulf War because we were in the First Gulf War and we were in he First Gulf War because of a diplomatic snafu. Punch 'April Glaspie' into Wikipedia and you will see what I mean.. Beyond that, we really had no business appointing a female ambassador to a middle eastern country, not because of qualifications or lack of them but out of respect for their beliefs as misguided as they might be.
2006-08-21 18:20:58 · answer #8 · answered by CallMeDigitalBob 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's happening in Iraq? You mean the fight on terrorism, I mean liberation of Iraq. Totaly waste of time and lives.
2006-08-18 03:40:25 · answer #9 · answered by aplusjimages 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, they're not! The rich fat cats in the government needs to get richer! Of course the US isn't wasting time nor soldiers' lives! If you can't tell, that was sarcasm....
2006-08-18 03:41:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No.
Our brothers and sisters out there is for a purpose out there serving for the good of mankind on planet earth.
They were not out there at their own whims and fancy.
They have to be there until the yellow ribbon comes out from planet earth.
So don't go on kicking their butts while they are out there.
2006-08-18 04:29:23 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋