Eli obvioulsy doesnt know too much bout football. Domanick Davis is a very good back but just because Houston has the worst pass protection in the league it doesnt meant they cant(run blocking and pass blocking arent the same thing) Texans actually run well. Second LT does not have one of the best lines, its not even considered good,can u name 1 starter without lookin at rosters?
Dat being said in all the years Ive watched college football there
has never seen ne1 as talented as this kid. But u have to take into consideration that hell split carrie and prolly wont be feature til prolly the end of the season. However Bush has prolly the best big play ability and itll give em a decent season. The true question is "How much will Bush dominate if he proves to be durable along with Mccallister out?ALOT
P.S u guys after him must be drunk to say he sucks. And hes #2 who da hell is in front?Michael Bennett got traded u idiot
2006-08-17 14:24:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Luigi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Umm... no.
First off, you have to have an offensive line to rush anywhere. Both Alexander and Tomlinson have brilliant offensive lines to run behind. Reggie Bush had one of the best lines in NCAA football to run behind. But now he's a Saint. And their offensive line is one of the holiest (pun intended) lines in the NFL. It would really surprise me if Bush broke 1000 yards. Did you know the Texans have a top-tier running back? Given a good offensive line, Domanick Davis could easily break 1500 year after year. Instead, he plays with an O-line that has given up the most sacks 3 consecutive years. Not really much you can do with that. And these are not stand in the pocket too long sacks. These are 2 step drop grass eaters. But back to your question.. My prediction is Bush will finish the year with 982 yards rushing.
2006-08-17 20:01:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Eli 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He has better cut back ability and better initial speed than any back in the NFL. That 44 yard run against the Titans last week is a prime example of what Reggie is all about. Yeah Yeah I know it was against the Titans... but you still have to be impressed on how he reversed fields the way he did. I haven't seen that since Barry Sanders played. Beside we ain't seen nothing yet, just wait and see what he does with about 10 or 15 touches in one game. I think he's going to be outstanding if he can avoid any major injuries.
2006-08-17 20:01:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dun Dun 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh lord no.
It's his first season, you shouldn't expect him to be LT quality. Plus he will be splitting carries with Deuce McAllister, which will cut his yards.
I'm predicting Reggie Bush to get about 700-750 yards over this season, which isn't bad for a rookie. His next few years will be interesting to watch though.
2006-08-17 19:55:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Southpaw 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
HELL NO DUDE WHAT R U WASTED!!!!!! reggie bush was a good COLLEGE football player. ill give u 3. reasons he'll suck. 1.hes on a crapy team with a crapy offense. 2.hes a good college player nd the difference between college football nd NFL football is very different. 3. Hes to small.
HE'LL NEVER EVER EVER EVER BE LT OR SHAUN ALEXANDER ONLY A DRUNK IDIOT WOULD THINK THAT!!!!
2006-08-17 20:06:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not nearly as good as SA or LT but he will have his games.
2006-08-17 20:18:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Evan Y 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not his first year. I say maybe he'll rush for 1000 yards this year.
2006-08-17 19:55:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by hardcoco 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
his holdout didnt help him, mcallister is gonna start fo the saints, bur bush will do good while mcallister is injuried
2006-08-18 23:05:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Antwaan M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well he is third on the depth chart. Enough said.
2006-08-17 20:03:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by ~O.N.E.~ 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
no he won't be as good as them yet.
2006-08-17 19:59:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋