English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

Impeachment hearing can only begin after the President commits and indictable offense. He's committed no crime so he gets to stay.

2006-08-15 07:39:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That would be the best thing that could happen. If they could do that, hopefully all his cronies would go down with him.

After what they did to Clinton for a B___job, they deserve the pay back!!!!

Hi has definately broken the law. The democrats have 26 broken laws worth impeaching a president. They are keeping this info close to the vest and will bring charges hopefully after they win the elections.

2006-08-14 13:52:47 · answer #2 · answered by Matrix 3 · 1 2

Who can say? I don't think it would accomplish anything constructive. Just being able to block most everything Bush wants to do should be satisfying enough for them. If they want revenge then probably they will impeach Bush.

2006-08-14 14:09:15 · answer #3 · answered by a_delphic_oracle 6 · 0 0

Unlike Clinton, Bush has committed no crimes that would warrant an impeachment.

And, don't get giddy fantasizing about Democrat gains in November. The lunatic fringe moon-battiness that is evident here, at KOS and which nominated Lamont over Lieberman is not going to play well in the election cycle. Thanks!

2006-08-14 14:02:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The Dems would impeach their own mother if it ment they would stay in power...And just for the record, can you tell me what
"crime" was committed by President Bush to be impeached?
If it's because of the Iraq war, he did not do this alone...he got approval from both sides of the aisle.

2006-08-14 14:08:07 · answer #5 · answered by 2179 4 · 1 3

No.

The amount of noise produced by the far left-wing greatly outweighs the power they possess (read, cooler heads will prevail).

Besides, it would rebound to benefit Republicans as the average voter, by a margin greater than 2-1, doesn't believe such an action is warranted.

2006-08-14 14:01:42 · answer #6 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0 1

Extremely unlikely. They would have to find a crime he comitted FIRST then have enough votes to move to impeachment, then actually have the "trial" and vote to impeach.

Come on people, it doesn't matter how much you like or dislike Bush, use come common sense and quit being so blinded by your naivety.

2006-08-14 13:59:26 · answer #7 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 1 2

It would be interesting to see them try...I say that because to impeach him would require the commitment of a crime and no such crimes have been committed. Being wrong is not a crime and some would argue he is not wrong. I say it would be interesting if they try because if they did and say they succeeded a very ugly precedent would be set....the party in charge gets to kick out the elected president when ever they see fit? Is that a good thing? Remember who is in charge now - they can get back if they lost it...

2006-08-14 13:52:47 · answer #8 · answered by netjr 6 · 0 3

and Cheney, Let's hope so and these veterans agree.

http://www.veteransforpeace.org/impeachment/impeachment.htm

2006-08-14 13:51:49 · answer #9 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 1 0

Why? There is no reason to. He hasn't commited any high crimes or misdemeanors.

Oh and I hope to God Democrats dont get control of both houses!

2006-08-14 13:52:56 · answer #10 · answered by Maggie Mae 3 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers