2006-08-08 13:51:56 · 22 answers · asked by fromprince2king 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i'd say either would be a refreshing change. if hard-pressed, i'd say hilary simply because she's a democrat and i liked her universal health plan idea. b.t.w. why can't they both run together on the same ticket and unite both the right and left; that'd be awesome!
2006-08-08 13:58:31 · answer #1 · answered by lady sixx 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Definitely Hilary Rodham CLINTON. We will get two for the price of one. Bill is no slouch and Hilary has a great mind as well. We sure would be better off than with Condaleeza.
2006-08-08 14:11:17 · answer #2 · answered by Black Beauty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton
2006-08-08 13:55:36 · answer #3 · answered by Still Halloween 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton (certain, her call has 2 ls in it - more effective acceptable a minimum of recognize a thanks to spell it in case you'll vote for her) is unelectable. There are merely about no conservatives or Republicans who like the female - in my opinion or politically. MANY Democrats and liberals don't love her. women folk electorate are chop up on her. to substantiate that Clinton to win, she could favor to consolidate the female vote and the liberal vote - which she can't do. Hell, merely look on the ladies answering this question saying they would not vote for her. She is liberal adequate to win the nomination, yet her procedures now leave doubt to that. She took a large type of warm temperature from the acute acceptable with the help of popping out and saying that there should be no timetable withdrawal from Iraq. Kerry-like wishy-washy mistake huge style a million. The a options-left wingers ALL sense like there should be a timetable for withdrawal - and the quicker the more effective acceptable. Kerry-like wishy-washy mistake huge style 2: Her stance on unlawful immigration has replaced 3 situations contained in the finest 3 hundred and sixty 5 days and a 1/2. Left wingers are literally not pleased with the differences, and acceptable-wingers are literally not satisfied with her differences. the female can't make up her recommendations and governs with the help of polls. We had adequate of that once her husband replaced into President. No, thank God, Hillary Clinton isn't electable. for that reason - and that reason on my own - I pray to God each evening that she will be in a position to win the nomination.
2016-11-23 16:46:40 · answer #4 · answered by prickett 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
H. Clinton
Btw, just read over the answers. For the guy who said Hillary is a liberal.. honey you need to get informed. She has a known record all her life of being a moderate to conservative democrat. I think it is because she was raised by republicans.
She is actually not liberal enough for me but I would vote for her just because I am sure she would re-implement Bill's Pay As You Go system he used to balance, and keep balanced, the budget. And also, hopefully she would finish reforming healthcare. We all know that we need something done in that area and she is the only one who has ever had the courage to take on the insurance companies who control it.
2006-08-08 13:58:01 · answer #5 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hilary
2006-08-08 13:56:09 · answer #6 · answered by parshooter 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a poor white man from the south, I would have no choice but to vote for Condaleeza. She tells you what she thinks and stands by it. Hilary is a flip-flopper that goes any which way the wind blows to get votes and power.
2006-08-08 14:00:23 · answer #7 · answered by Jack S. Buy more ammo! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary
2006-08-08 13:55:05 · answer #8 · answered by FootballFan1012 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton because Rice is Bush's puppet.
2006-08-08 14:06:35 · answer #9 · answered by Tabi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conde Rice!
2006-08-08 13:55:47 · answer #10 · answered by Amilucky0707 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would have to be Hilary Clinton no more republicans
2006-08-08 13:56:53 · answer #11 · answered by Susie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋