English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They have nothing else to say. It is pathetic

2006-08-08 13:15:43 · 24 answers · asked by Ah Ha 3 in Politics & Government Politics

24 answers

we actually have a lot more to say... but Republicans only like to say that democrats have nothing else to say...

http://www.dnc.org/agenda.html

and let us remember, a major Bush platform was basically "Clinton sucks" when he got elected the first time.. remember his pleas for moral character in the White House?

so again, you can do it and we can't.... are you going to cry about it?

you're not going to sing "take on me" are you?

2006-08-08 13:22:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I know how to say:

He and his cronies came up with a poor strategic plan for the war.

Bush lied to the general public when he said the following things:
Agreed to a question asking if he would fire anyone involved in leaking Plame's identity saying, "Yes."
Said that no one could have expected the levees to break, when he was warned of just such a thing two days prior to Katrina coming ashore.
In response to deficit spending, claimed that he said in a Chicago campaign stop he would only deficit spend in times of war, economic despair, or national emergency. He said he never expected the trifecta. In fact, he never said it - Gore did.

I can also say that he has presided over an economic recovery that has produced the lowest job growth in the US since WWII.

Those are just a few areas where the President has been wrong, corrupt, and has issued a variety of poor policies. I haven't even gone into the Constitutional violations of Gitmo (Supreme Court said so, not me); the potential Constitutional violations of the NSA wiretaps; or the Constitutional violations of his signing statements - signing bills then basically saying he doesn't have to enforce them (he's done it 200 times more than the 42 presidents before him combined!).

Okay, I'll stop. I can say a whole lot more than Bush sucks. I can explain to you exactly why he he's a horrible president.

I can also say that once a new person gets into office, I hope it's someone who will reign in spending, stop making irresponsible tax cuts when the deficit is already at highest levels (sure it's on its way down, but being proud of the third highest deficit in US history is a little disturbing). I hope it's someone who will only commit US soldiers when the US is truly under threat (Afghanistan - fine; Iraq - not fine). If that president does order servicemen into combat, I hope that he and his people will actually listen to professional soldiers when constructing their strategy - use the right number of troops, prepare for an insurgency, admit mistakes when they're made. I hope the next president will be honest and up front with the American people. I understand that the president can't tell everyone everything, but he doesn't have to outright lie (don't think I celebrate Clinton without the understanding that he too lied to the American people and I curse him for that).

So you see. Some of us do look for people with plans. Some of us are not going to vote for a Republican candidate again, until I see that they've have lopped off ties with the radical right and the Neo-Conservative movement. Some of us do think the president has done a horrible job and can also look forward to a president with real plans - not one who tricks people into thinking he's got a plan.

2006-08-08 13:52:39 · answer #2 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 0 0

It's usually the uneducated ones that do not have fully developed political opinions. Young people these days are brainwashed into following the anti-bush trend, without an actual basis for their judgements.

I can understand some of the people who actually DO have evidence and a supporting argument, but the constant "bush sucks" from people is extremely annoying and does not display any signs of intelligence.

2006-08-08 13:21:25 · answer #3 · answered by Steven B 6 · 0 0

Kinda intense high quality which you purely forgot while pointing out your "proofs" that the fee of the yank dollar substitute into happening way down way formerly the democrats have been given skill. i assume that's the sign of an financial gadget going properly while different the international do no longer prefer to have something to do along with your distant places money. Republicans and ignorant human beings such as you are able to comprehend that a recession of this international importance isn't able to take place in 2 years. the outcomes have been considered and felt badly the final one million twelve months or so inspite of the undeniable fact that it took plenty greater time to make it take place. a minimum of five - 10 - 15 years previously. Use your suggestions for god sakes.

2016-11-04 04:12:42 · answer #4 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

No, unless they don't speak English and only know those words. It isn't based on which political party you are for, it's how much English each person has learned.
Yeah, people thinks he sucks. But they are at fault for not knowing all the **** Bush has been put through. He's done a good job.
Just get over it.

2006-08-08 13:26:14 · answer #5 · answered by 4 · 0 0

No we can also say..Bush is a moron... Bush is self centered bastard...Bush is a terrible president... Bush don't like black people... BUSH SUCKS!

Oh and To you who says try to do his job.. Clinton did and we had jobs gas was cheaper and so forth and Clinton did all this while banging an intern...Man he's good. But you are right it's hard to be president when you are trying to rip the whole world off and covering your tracks.!

2006-08-08 13:27:55 · answer #6 · answered by e_deckwa 5 · 1 0

I challenge anyone who says Bush sucks to try and do his job under the significant circumstances he has endured and be successful...you can't so grow up a and understand that the President is a figure head and at least he, on the surface, does display SOME morals and values.

2006-08-08 13:25:05 · answer #7 · answered by Lulu 3 · 0 1

It's not a matter of what they know how to say, it's a matter of what they can agree on. Both partys are non-ideological coalitions, but the Democrats are broad based to the point of schizophrenia. Bush hatred is the only thing holding them together.

2006-08-08 13:27:09 · answer #8 · answered by azmountaintroll 3 · 0 1

This is how they try to win votes. They are gloomy. All things are terrible.

Yet the economy booms with record gas prices, unemployment near record lows, housing market booms, his tax cuts stimulated the economy, and we're winning the war on terror.

Offshore idol
Clinton had osamd didn't think he was a threat so he let him go.
China gained numerous military secrets because of Bill.
North Korea went laughing to the launching pad with 6 Billion dollars
Not to mention LYING to a grand jury, federal at that, and during his presidency he had the highest gas prices at that time during his presidency.
Read a history book.

2006-08-08 13:20:50 · answer #9 · answered by John 3 · 0 1

I am not in favor of George Bush, however I am not a Democrat. And besides not all Democratic are like that, don't generalize.

2006-08-08 13:21:18 · answer #10 · answered by confetticupcakes 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers