Do you like your second amendment rights?

Question

If the UN had their way all legal responsible gun owners would lose this right. They even have a statue of a gun with a knot tied in its barrel to signify that all guns should be taken from the hands of civilians (whether they have committed a crime or not).

Suggested web site
www.jbs.org

Answer 1

They can have my guns when they pry them from my cold, dead fingers. Of course they'd have to cross my front lawn appropriately adorned with Claymores to get them.

The UN is dead, corruption and career politicians saw to that.

Answer 2

this only works as long as all the people with guns are like minded .
WHEN we have people roaming our streets killing and robbing others then it becomes a matter for the public to decide what rights are needed to defend america .
I would say that anyone with the proper education who can fill out some forms is allowed to have any gun they desire with no limits .THE resale of these weapons would be a crime punishable by 20 years in prison .IF the rules are not followed .
YOU must have an education to own a gun .THIS way it is used in a proper manner and not for violence but protection .
YOU should not own a gun if your mind is so weak you can not read and fill out some forms .THIS will only lead to the mis-use of the gun in the long run .
When these rights were given people did not have in mind that the world would be where it is at today .WILD animals are no longer a threat GOVERMENTS have the total ability to defend america and we have the ability to change the government peacefully without violence .
THE reason we need a militia was america was in constant termoil and it was also a tool for hunting and protection . TODAY we have those needs provided for and i do want gun owner-ship just resonable and educated people should be the protectors of our freedoms not the mob mentality that arises so often .

Answer 3

Well, If I felt I needed to bear arms, I would like to have the option. So yes. I think the main goal of the UN on their views of gun control is not taking guns from innocent civilians defending themselves, but from those who attack. Unfortunately, it's a right that everyone has.

Answer 4

Hey I'd give up my Glock any day for a rail gun or a thermonuclear device.

The 2nd is not about personal protection it about stopping a corrupt government.

Imagine if a blue stater got elected to the presidency. People have the right to stop that kind of corruption.

Go big Red Go

Answer 5

And that is how every dictator took power in the start, and the UN would love to take all our guns and if we don't watch the libs they will get them

Answer 6

Yes

Answer 7

The reason they want to take our weapons from us is to castrate the people leaving them no way to fight all out tyranny and total control from our government. They know we will defend our rights to the death. Also think about it the criminals would still have their guns, hell they don't go through waiting periods or register their weapons.

Answer 8

I don't see a threat to 2nd Am rights anywhere the radar. If the UN can't disarm Hezbollah, how will they disarm America? Why don't you think about something else?

Answer 9

Love 'em. BANG!

By the way,Massachussets has stringent guns laws and LOW gun murder rates.The slogan is"You're more likely to live here".True.

Also,dont you think those too obsessed with 2nd Ammendment right are a bit morbid?Heard one drunk in Texas shot a toilet to peices for it not FLUSHING FAST ENOUGH.

Yeah.Love them guns.Guns are our friends!

Answer 10

I love my rights. The gun owners of our country will be the ones to defend it later on...When the dems let the rioters run amok...